¡¶a history of science-2¡·

ÏÂÔر¾Êé

Ìí¼ÓÊéÇ©

a history of science-2- µÚ25²¿·Ö


°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡û »ò ¡ú ¿É¿ìËÙÉÏÏ·­Ò³£¬°´¼üÅÌÉ쵀 Enter ¼ü¿É»Øµ½±¾ÊéĿ¼ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡ü ¿É»Øµ½±¾Ò³¶¥²¿£¡
c¡¡mind¡¡predictions¡¡of¡¡earthly¡¡events¡¡would¡¡surely¡¡seem¡¡no¡¡more¡¡miraculous¡¡than¡¡correct¡¡predictions¡¡as¡¡to¡¡the¡¡future¡¡movements¡¡of¡¡the¡¡sun£»¡¡moon£»¡¡and¡¡stars¡£¡¡When¡¡astronomy¡¡had¡¡reached¡¡a¡¡stage¡¡of¡¡development¡¡so¡¡that¡¡such¡¡things¡¡as¡¡eclipses¡¡could¡¡be¡¡predicted¡¡with¡¡anything¡¡like¡¡accuracy£»¡¡the¡¡occult¡¡knowledge¡¡of¡¡the¡¡astronomer¡¡would¡¡be¡¡unquestioned¡£¡¡Turning¡¡this¡¡apparently¡¡occult¡¡knowledge¡¡to¡¡account¡¡in¡¡a¡¡mercenary¡¡way¡¡would¡¡then¡¡be¡¡the¡¡inevitable¡¡result£»¡¡although¡¡it¡¡cannot¡¡be¡¡doubted¡¡that¡¡many¡¡of¡¡the¡¡astrologers£»¡¡in¡¡all¡¡ages£»¡¡were¡¡sincere¡¡in¡¡their¡¡beliefs¡£¡¡Later£»¡¡as¡¡the¡¡business¡¡of¡¡astrology¡¡became¡¡a¡¡profitable¡¡one£»¡¡sincere¡¡astronomers¡¡would¡¡find¡¡it¡¡expedient¡¡to¡¡practise¡¡astrology¡¡as¡¡a¡¡means¡¡of¡¡gaining¡¡a¡¡livelihood¡£¡¡Such¡¡a¡¡philosopher¡¡as¡¡Kepler¡¡freely¡¡admitted¡¡that¡¡he¡¡practised¡¡astrology¡¡¡¨to¡¡keep¡¡from¡¡starving£»¡¨¡¡although¡¡he¡¡confessed¡¡no¡¡faith¡¡in¡¡such¡¡predictions¡£¡¡¡¨Ye¡¡otherwise¡¡philosophers£»¡¨¡¡he¡¡said£»¡¡¡¨ye¡¡censure¡¡this¡¡daughter¡¡of¡¡astronomy¡¡beyond¡¡her¡¡deserts£»¡¡know¡¡ye¡¡not¡¡that¡¡she¡¡must¡¡support¡¡her¡¡mother¡¡by¡¡her¡¡charms¡£¡¨¡¡Once¡¡astrology¡¡had¡¡become¡¡an¡¡established¡¡practice£»¡¡any¡¡considerable¡¡knowledge¡¡of¡¡astronomy¡¡was¡¡unnecessary£»¡¡for¡¡as¡¡it¡¡was¡¡at¡¡best¡¡but¡¡a¡¡system¡¡of¡¡good¡¡guessing¡¡as¡¡to¡¡future¡¡events£»¡¡clever¡¡impostors¡¡could¡¡thrive¡¡equally¡¡well¡¡without¡¡troubling¡¡to¡¡study¡¡astronomy¡£¡¡The¡¡celebrated¡¡astrologers£»¡¡however£»¡¡were¡¡usually¡¡astronomers¡¡as¡¡well£»¡¡and¡¡undoubtedly¡¡based¡¡many¡¡of¡¡their¡¡predictions¡¡on¡¡the¡¡position¡¡and¡¡movements¡¡of¡¡the¡¡heavenly¡¡bodies¡£¡¡Thus£»¡¡the¡¡casting¡¡of¡¡a¡¡horoscope¡¡that¡¡is£»¡¡the¡¡methods¡¡by¡¡which¡¡the¡¡astrologers¡¡ascertained¡¡the¡¡relative¡¡position¡¡of¡¡the¡¡heavenly¡¡bodies¡¡at¡¡the¡¡time¡¡of¡¡a¡¡birthwas¡¡a¡¡simple¡¡but¡¡fairly¡¡exact¡¡procedure¡£¡¡Its¡¡basis¡¡was¡¡the¡¡zodiac£»¡¡or¡¡the¡¡path¡¡traced¡¡by¡¡the¡¡sun¡¡in¡¡his¡¡yearly¡¡course¡¡through¡¡certain¡¡constellations¡£¡¡At¡¡the¡¡moment¡¡of¡¡the¡¡birth¡¡of¡¡a¡¡child£»¡¡the¡¡first¡¡care¡¡of¡¡the¡¡astrologer¡¡was¡¡to¡¡note¡¡the¡¡particular¡¡part¡¡of¡¡the¡¡zodiac¡¡that¡¡appeared¡¡on¡¡the¡¡horizon¡£¡¡The¡¡zodiac¡¡was¡¡then¡¡divided¡¡into¡¡¡¨houses¡¨that¡¡is£»¡¡into¡¡twelve¡¡spaceson¡¡a¡¡chart¡£¡¡In¡¡these¡¡houses¡¡were¡¡inserted¡¡the¡¡places¡¡of¡¡the¡¡planets£»¡¡sun£»¡¡and¡¡moon£»¡¡with¡¡reference¡¡to¡¡the¡¡zodiac¡£¡¡When¡¡this¡¡chart¡¡was¡¡completed¡¡it¡¡made¡¡a¡¡fairly¡¡correct¡¡diagram¡¡of¡¡the¡¡heavens¡¡and¡¡the¡¡position¡¡of¡¡the¡¡heavenly¡¡bodies¡¡as¡¡they¡¡would¡¡appear¡¡to¡¡a¡¡person¡¡standing¡¡at¡¡the¡¡place¡¡of¡¡birth¡¡at¡¡a¡¡certain¡¡time¡£¡¡Up¡¡to¡¡this¡¡point¡¡the¡¡process¡¡was¡¡a¡¡simple¡¡one¡¡of¡¡astronomy¡£¡¡But¡¡the¡¡next¡¡stepthe¡¡really¡¡important¡¡onethat¡¡of¡¡interpreting¡¡this¡¡chart£»¡¡was¡¡the¡¡one¡¡which¡¡called¡¡forth¡¡the¡¡skill¡¡and¡¡imagination¡¡of¡¡the¡¡astrologer¡£¡¡In¡¡this¡¡interpretation£»¡¡not¡¡in¡¡his¡¡mere¡¡observations£»¡¡lay¡¡the¡¡secret¡¡of¡¡his¡¡success¡£¡¡Nor¡¡did¡¡his¡¡task¡¡cease¡¡with¡¡simply¡¡foretelling¡¡future¡¡events¡¡that¡¡were¡¡to¡¡happen¡¡in¡¡the¡¡life¡¡of¡¡the¡¡newly¡¡born¡¡infant¡£¡¡He¡¡must¡¡not¡¡only¡¡point¡¡out¡¡the¡¡dangers£»¡¡but¡¡show¡¡the¡¡means¡¡whereby¡¡they¡¡could¡¡be¡¡averted£»¡¡and¡¡his¡¡prophylactic¡¡measures£»¡¡like¡¡his¡¡predictions£»¡¡were¡¡alleged¡¡to¡¡be¡¡based¡¡on¡¡his¡¡reading¡¡of¡¡the¡¡stars¡£¡¡But¡¡casting¡¡a¡¡horoscope¡¡at¡¡the¡¡time¡¡of¡¡births¡¡was£»¡¡of¡¡course£»¡¡only¡¡a¡¡small¡¡part¡¡of¡¡the¡¡astrologer's¡¡duty¡£¡¡His¡¡offices¡¡were¡¡sought¡¡by¡¡persons¡¡of¡¡all¡¡ages¡¡for¡¡predictions¡¡as¡¡to¡¡their¡¡futures£»¡¡the¡¡movements¡¡of¡¡an¡¡enemy£»¡¡where¡¡to¡¡find¡¡stolen¡¡goods£»¡¡and¡¡a¡¡host¡¡of¡¡everyday¡¡occurrences¡£¡¡In¡¡such¡¡cases¡¡it¡¡is¡¡more¡¡than¡¡probable¡¡that¡¡the¡¡astrologers¡¡did¡¡very¡¡little¡¡consulting¡¡of¡¡the¡¡stars¡¡in¡¡making¡¡their¡¡predictions¡£¡¡They¡¡became¡¡expert¡¡physiognomists¡¡and¡¡excellent¡¡judges¡¡of¡¡human¡¡nature£»¡¡and¡¡were¡¡thus¡¡able¡¡to¡¡foretell¡¡futures¡¡with¡¡the¡¡same¡¡shrewdness¡¡and¡¡by¡¡the¡¡same¡¡methods¡¡as¡¡the¡¡modern¡¡¡¨mediums£»¡¨¡¡palmists£»¡¡and¡¡fortune¡­tellers¡£¡¡To¡¡strengthen¡¡belief¡¡in¡¡their¡¡powers£»¡¡it¡¡became¡¡a¡¡common¡¡thing¡¡for¡¡some¡¡supposedly¡¡lost¡¡document¡¡of¡¡the¡¡astrologer¡¡to¡¡be¡¡mysteriously¡¡discovered¡¡after¡¡an¡¡important¡¡event£»¡¡this¡¡document¡¡purporting¡¡to¡¡foretell¡¡this¡¡very¡¡event¡£¡¡It¡¡was¡¡also¡¡a¡¡common¡¡practice¡¡with¡¡astrologers¡¡to¡¡retain£»¡¡or¡¡have¡¡access¡¡to£»¡¡their¡¡original¡¡charts£»¡¡cleverly¡¡altering¡¡them¡¡from¡¡time¡¡to¡¡time¡¡to¡¡fit¡¡conditions¡£¡¡The¡¡dangers¡¡attendant¡¡upon¡¡astrology¡¡were¡¡of¡¡such¡¡a¡¡nature¡¡that¡¡the¡¡lot¡¡of¡¡the¡¡astrologer¡¡was¡¡likely¡¡to¡¡prove¡¡anything¡¡but¡¡an¡¡enviable¡¡one¡£¡¡As¡¡in¡¡the¡¡case¡¡of¡¡the¡¡alchemist£»¡¡the¡¡greater¡¡the¡¡reputation¡¡of¡¡an¡¡astrologer¡¡the¡¡greater¡¡dangers¡¡he¡¡was¡¡likely¡¡to¡¡fall¡¡into¡£¡¡If¡¡he¡¡became¡¡so¡¡famous¡¡that¡¡he¡¡was¡¡employed¡¡by¡¡kings¡¡or¡¡noblemen£»¡¡his¡¡too¡¡true¡¡or¡¡too¡¡false¡¡prophecies¡¡were¡¡likely¡¡to¡¡bring¡¡him¡¡into¡¡disreputeeven¡¡to¡¡endanger¡¡his¡¡life¡£¡¡Throughout¡¡the¡¡dark¡¡age¡¡the¡¡astrologers¡¡flourished£»¡¡but¡¡the¡¡sixteenth¡¡and¡¡seventeenth¡¡centuries¡¡were¡¡the¡¡golden¡¡age¡¡of¡¡these¡¡impostors¡£¡¡A¡¡skilful¡¡astrologer¡¡was¡¡as¡¡much¡¡an¡¡essential¡¡to¡¡the¡¡government¡¡as¡¡the¡¡highest¡¡official£»¡¡and¡¡it¡¡would¡¡have¡¡been¡¡a¡¡bold¡¡monarch£»¡¡indeed£»¡¡who¡¡would¡¡undertake¡¡any¡¡expedition¡¡of¡¡importance¡¡unless¡¡sanctioned¡¡by¡¡the¡¡governing¡¡stars¡¡as¡¡interpreted¡¡by¡¡these¡¡officials¡£¡¡It¡¡should¡¡not¡¡be¡¡understood£»¡¡however£»¡¡that¡¡belief¡¡in¡¡astrology¡¡died¡¡with¡¡the¡¡advent¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Copernican¡¡doctrine¡£¡¡It¡¡did¡¡become¡¡separated¡¡from¡¡astronomy¡¡very¡¡shortly¡¡after£»¡¡to¡¡be¡¡sure£»¡¡and¡¡undoubtedly¡¡among¡¡the¡¡scientists¡¡it¡¡lost¡¡much¡¡of¡¡its¡¡prestige¡£¡¡But¡¡it¡¡cannot¡¡be¡¡considered¡¡as¡¡entirely¡¡passed¡¡away£»¡¡even¡¡to¡­day£»¡¡and¡¡even¡¡if¡¡we¡¡leave¡¡out¡¡of¡¡consideration¡¡street¡­corner¡¡¡¨astrologers¡¨¡¡and¡¡fortune¡­tellers£»¡¡whose¡¡signs¡¡may¡¡be¡¡seen¡¡in¡¡every¡¡large¡¡city£»¡¡there¡¡still¡¡remains¡¡quite¡¡a¡¡large¡¡class¡¡of¡¡relatively¡¡intelligent¡¡people¡¡who¡¡believe¡¡in¡¡what¡¡they¡¡call¡¡¡¨the¡¡science¡¡of¡¡astrology¡£¡¨¡¡Needless¡¡to¡¡say£»¡¡such¡¡people¡¡are¡¡not¡¡found¡¡among¡¡the¡¡scientific¡¡thinkers£»¡¡but¡¡it¡¡is¡¡significant¡¡that¡¡scarcely¡¡a¡¡year¡¡passes¡¡that¡¡some¡¡book¡¡or¡¡pamphlet¡¡is¡¡not¡¡published¡¡by¡¡some¡¡ardent¡¡believer¡¡in¡¡astrology£»¡¡attempting¡¡to¡¡prove¡¡by¡¡the¡¡illogical¡¡dogmas¡¡characteristic¡¡of¡¡unscientific¡¡thinkers¡¡that¡¡astrology¡¡is¡¡a¡¡science¡£¡¡The¡¡arguments¡¡contained¡¡in¡¡these¡¡pamphlets¡¡are¡¡very¡¡much¡¡the¡¡same¡¡as¡¡those¡¡of¡¡the¡¡astrologers¡¡three¡¡hundred¡¡years¡¡ago£»¡¡except¡¡that¡¡they¡¡lack¡¡the¡¡quaint¡¡form¡¡of¡¡wording¡¡which¡¡is¡¡one¡¡of¡¡the¡¡features¡¡that¡¡lends¡¡interest¡¡to¡¡the¡¡older¡¡documents¡£¡¡These¡¡pamphlets¡¡need¡¡not¡¡be¡¡taken¡¡seriously£»¡¡but¡¡they¡¡are¡¡interesting¡¡as¡¡exemplifying¡¡how¡¡difficult¡¡it¡¡is£»¡¡even¡¡in¡¡an¡¡age¡¡of¡¡science£»¡¡to¡¡entirely¡¡stamp¡¡out¡¡firmly¡¡established¡¡superstitions¡£¡¡Here¡¡are¡¡some¡¡of¡¡the¡¡arguments¡¡advanced¡¡in¡¡defence¡¡of¡¡astrology£»¡¡taken¡¡from¡¡a¡¡little¡¡brochure¡¡entitled¡¡¡¨Astrology¡¡Vindicated£»¡¨¡¡published¡¡in¡¡1898£º¡¡It¡¡will¡¡be¡¡found¡¡that¡¡a¡¡person¡¡born¡¡when¡¡the¡¡Sun¡¡is¡¡in¡¡twenty¡¡degrees¡¡Scorpio¡¡has¡¡the¡¡left¡¡ear¡¡as¡¡his¡¡exceptional¡¡feature¡¡and¡¡the¡¡nose¡¡£¨Sagittarius£©¡¡bent¡¡towards¡¡the¡¡left¡¡ear¡£¡¡A¡¡person¡¡born¡¡when¡¡the¡¡Sun¡¡is¡¡in¡¡any¡¡of¡¡the¡¡latter¡¡degrees¡¡of¡¡Taurus£»¡¡say¡¡the¡¡twenty¡­fifth¡¡degree£»¡¡will¡¡have¡¡a¡¡small£»¡¡sharp£»¡¡weak¡¡chin£»¡¡curved¡¡up¡¡towards¡¡Gemini£»¡¡the¡¡two¡¡vertical¡¡lines¡¡on¡¡the¡¡upper¡¡lip¡£¡¨£§4£§¡¡The¡¡time¡¡was¡¡when¡¡science¡¡went¡¡out¡¡of¡¡its¡¡way¡¡to¡¡prove¡¡that¡¡such¡¡statements¡¡were¡¡untrue£»¡¡but¡¡that¡¡time¡¡is¡¡past£»¡¡and¡¡such¡¡writers¡¡are¡¡usually¡¡classed¡¡among¡¡those¡¡energetic¡¡but¡¡misguided¡¡persons¡¡who¡¡are¡¡unable¡¡to¡¡distinguish¡¡between¡¡logic¡¡and¡¡sophistry¡£

In¡¡England£»¡¡from¡¡the¡¡time¡¡of¡¡Elizabeth¡¡to¡¡the¡¡reign¡¡of¡¡William¡¡and¡¡Mary£»¡¡judicial¡¡astrology¡¡was¡¡at¡¡its¡¡height¡£¡¡After¡¡the¡¡great¡¡London¡¡fire£»¡¡in¡¡1666£»¡¡a¡¡committee¡¡of¡¡the¡¡House¡¡of¡¡Commons¡¡publicly¡¡summoned¡¡the¡¡famous¡¡astrologer£»¡¡Lilly£»¡¡to¡¡come¡¡before¡¡Parliament¡¡and¡¡report¡¡to¡¡them¡¡on¡¡his¡¡alleged¡¡prediction¡¡of¡¡the¡¡calamity¡¡that¡¡had¡¡befallen¡¡the¡¡city¡£¡¡Lilly£»¡¡for¡¡some¡¡reason¡¡best¡¡known¡¡to¡¡himself£»¡¡denied¡¡having¡¡made¡¡such¡¡a¡¡prediction£»¡¡being£»¡¡as¡¡he¡¡explained£»¡¡¡¨more¡¡interested¡¡in¡¡determining¡¡affairs¡¡of¡¡much¡¡more¡¡importance¡¡to¡¡the¡¡future¡¡welfare¡¡of¡¡the¡¡country¡£¡¨¡¡Some¡¡of¡¡the¡¡explanations¡¡of¡¡his¡¡interpretations¡¡will¡¡suffice¡¡to¡¡show¡¡their¡¡absurdities£»¡¡which£»¡¡however£»¡¡were¡¡by¡¡no¡¡means¡¡regarded¡¡as¡¡absurdities¡¡at¡¡that¡¡time£»¡¡for¡¡Lilly¡¡was¡¡one¡¡of¡¡the¡¡greatest¡¡astrologers¡¡of¡¡his¡¡day¡£¡¡He¡¡said¡¡that¡¡in¡¡1588¡¡a¡¡prophecy¡¡had¡¡been¡¡printed¡¡in¡¡Greek¡¡characters¡¡which¡¡foretold¡¡exactly¡¡the¡¡troubles¡¡of¡¡England¡¡between¡¡the¡¡years¡¡1641¡£¡¡and¡¡1660¡£¡¡¡¨And¡¡after¡¡him¡¡shall¡¡come¡¡a¡¡dreadful¡¡dead¡¡man£»¡¨¡¡ran¡¡the¡¡prophecy£»¡¡¡¨and¡¡with¡¡him¡¡a¡¡royal¡¡G¡¡of¡¡the¡¡best¡¡blood¡¡in¡¡the¡¡world£»¡¡and¡¡he¡¡shall¡¡have¡¡the¡¡crown¡¡and¡¡shall¡¡set¡¡England¡¡on¡¡the¡¡right¡¡way¡¡and¡¡put¡¡out¡¡all¡¡heresies¡£¡¡His¡¡interpretation¡¡of¡¡this¡¡was¡¡that£»¡¡¡¨Monkery¡¡being¡¡extinguished¡¡above¡¡eighty¡¡or¡¡ninety¡¡years£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡Lord¡¡General's¡¡name¡¡being¡¡Monk£»¡¡is¡¡the¡¡dead¡¡man¡£¡¡The¡¡royal¡¡G¡¡or¡¡C¡¡£¨it¡¡is¡¡gamma¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Greek£»¡¡intending¡¡C¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Latin£»¡¡being¡¡the¡¡third¡¡letter¡¡in¡¡the¡¡alphabet£©¡¡is¡¡Charles¡¡II¡££»¡¡who£»¡¡for¡¡his¡¡extraction£»¡¡may¡¡be¡¡said¡¡to¡¡be¡¡of¡¡the¡¡best¡¡blood¡¡of¡¡the¡¡world¡£¡¨£§5£§¡¡This¡¡may¡¡be¡¡taken¡¡as¡¡a¡¡fair¡¡sample¡¡of¡¡Lilly's¡¡interpretations¡¡of¡¡astrological¡¡prophesies£»¡¡but¡¡many¡¡of¡¡his¡¡own¡¡writings£»¡¡while¡¡somewhat¡¡more¡¡definite¡¡and¡¡direct£»¡¡are¡¡still¡¡left¡¡sufficiently¡¡vague¡¡to¡¡allow¡¡his¡¡skilful¡¡interpretations¡¡to¡¡set¡¡right¡¡an¡¡apparent¡¡mistake¡£¡¡One¡¡of¡¡his¡¡famous¡¡documents¡¡was¡¡¡¨The¡¡Starry¡¡Messenger£»¡¨¡¡a¡¡little¡¡pamphlet¡¡purporting¡¡to¡¡explain¡¡the¡¡phenomenon¡¡of¡¡a¡¡¡¨strange¡¡apparition¡¡of¡¡three¡¡suns¡¨¡¡that¡¡were¡¡seen¡¡in¡¡London¡¡on¡¡November¡¡19£»¡¡1644¡­the¡¡anniversary¡¡of¡¡the¡¡birth¡¡of¡¡Charles¡¡I¡££»¡¡then¡¡the¡¡reigning¡¡monarch¡£¡¡This¡¡phenomenon¡¡caused¡¡a¡¡great¡¡stir¡¡among¡¡the¡¡English¡¡astrologers£»¡¡coming£»¡¡as¡¡it¡¡did£»¡¡at¡¡a¡¡time¡¡of¡¡great¡¡political¡¡disturbance¡£¡¡Prophecies¡¡were¡¡numerous£»¡¡and¡¡Lilly's¡¡brochure¡¡is¡¡only¡¡one¡¡of¡¡many¡¡that¡¡appeared¡¡at¡¡that¡¡time£»¡¡most¡¡of¡¡which£»¡¡however£»¡¡have¡¡been¡¡lost¡£¡¡Lilly£»¡¡in¡¡his¡¡preface£»¡¡says£º¡¡¡¨If¡¡there¡¡be¡¡any¡¡of¡¡so¡¡prevaricate¡¡a¡¡judgment¡¡as¡¡to¡¡think¡¡that¡¡the¡¡apparition¡¡of¡¡these¡¡three¡¡Suns¡¡doth¡¡intimate¡¡no¡¡Nov
СÌáʾ£º°´ »Ø³µ [Enter] ¼ü ·µ»ØÊéÄ¿£¬°´ ¡û ¼ü ·µ»ØÉÏÒ»Ò³£¬ °´ ¡ú ¼ü ½øÈëÏÂÒ»Ò³¡£ ÔÞһϠÌí¼ÓÊéÇ©¼ÓÈëÊé¼Ü