observed¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Hippias£»¡¡cannot¡¡with¡¡certainty¡¡be¡¡adduced¡¡on¡¡either¡¡side¡¡of
the¡¡argument¡£¡¡¡¡On¡¡the¡¡whole£»¡¡more¡¡may¡¡be¡¡said¡¡in¡¡favour¡¡of¡¡the¡¡genuineness
of¡¡the¡¡Hippias¡¡than¡¡against¡¡it¡£
The¡¡Menexenus¡¡or¡¡Funeral¡¡Oration¡¡is¡¡cited¡¡by¡¡Aristotle£»¡¡and¡¡is¡¡interesting
as¡¡supplying¡¡an¡¡example¡¡of¡¡the¡¡manner¡¡in¡¡which¡¡the¡¡orators¡¡praised¡¡'the
Athenians¡¡among¡¡the¡¡Athenians£»'¡¡falsifying¡¡persons¡¡and¡¡dates£»¡¡and¡¡casting¡¡a
veil¡¡over¡¡the¡¡gloomier¡¡events¡¡of¡¡Athenian¡¡history¡£¡¡¡¡It¡¡exhibits¡¡an
acquaintance¡¡with¡¡the¡¡funeral¡¡oration¡¡of¡¡Thucydides£»¡¡and¡¡was£»¡¡perhaps£»
intended¡¡to¡¡rival¡¡that¡¡great¡¡work¡£¡¡¡¡If¡¡genuine£»¡¡the¡¡proper¡¡place¡¡of¡¡the
Menexenus¡¡would¡¡be¡¡at¡¡the¡¡end¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Phaedrus¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡satirical¡¡opening¡¡and
the¡¡concluding¡¡words¡¡bear¡¡a¡¡great¡¡resemblance¡¡to¡¡the¡¡earlier¡¡dialogues£»¡¡the
oration¡¡itself¡¡is¡¡professedly¡¡a¡¡mimetic¡¡work£»¡¡like¡¡the¡¡speeches¡¡in¡¡the
Phaedrus£»¡¡and¡¡cannot¡¡therefore¡¡be¡¡tested¡¡by¡¡a¡¡comparison¡¡of¡¡the¡¡other
writings¡¡of¡¡Plato¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡funeral¡¡oration¡¡of¡¡Pericles¡¡is¡¡expressly¡¡mentioned
in¡¡the¡¡Phaedrus£»¡¡and¡¡this¡¡may¡¡have¡¡suggested¡¡the¡¡subject£»¡¡in¡¡the¡¡same
manner¡¡that¡¡the¡¡Cleitophon¡¡appears¡¡to¡¡be¡¡suggested¡¡by¡¡the¡¡slight¡¡mention¡¡of
Cleitophon¡¡and¡¡his¡¡attachment¡¡to¡¡Thrasymachus¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Republic£»¡¡and¡¡the
Theages¡¡by¡¡the¡¡mention¡¡of¡¡Theages¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Apology¡¡and¡¡Republic£»¡¡or¡¡as¡¡the
Second¡¡Alcibiades¡¡seems¡¡to¡¡be¡¡founded¡¡upon¡¡the¡¡text¡¡of¡¡Xenophon£»¡¡Mem¡£¡¡¡¡A
similar¡¡taste¡¡for¡¡parody¡¡appears¡¡not¡¡only¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Phaedrus£»¡¡but¡¡in¡¡the
Protagoras£»¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Symposium£»¡¡and¡¡to¡¡a¡¡certain¡¡extent¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Parmenides¡£
To¡¡these¡¡two¡¡doubtful¡¡writings¡¡of¡¡Plato¡¡I¡¡have¡¡added¡¡the¡¡First¡¡Alcibiades£»
which£»¡¡of¡¡all¡¡the¡¡disputed¡¡dialogues¡¡of¡¡Plato£»¡¡has¡¡the¡¡greatest¡¡merit£»¡¡and
is¡¡somewhat¡¡longer¡¡than¡¡any¡¡of¡¡them£»¡¡though¡¡not¡¡verified¡¡by¡¡the¡¡testimony
of¡¡Aristotle£»¡¡and¡¡in¡¡many¡¡respects¡¡at¡¡variance¡¡with¡¡the¡¡Symposium¡¡in¡¡the
description¡¡of¡¡the¡¡relations¡¡of¡¡Socrates¡¡and¡¡Alcibiades¡£¡¡¡¡Like¡¡the¡¡Lesser
Hippias¡¡and¡¡the¡¡Menexenus£»¡¡it¡¡is¡¡to¡¡be¡¡compared¡¡to¡¡the¡¡earlier¡¡writings¡¡of
Plato¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡motive¡¡of¡¡the¡¡piece¡¡may£»¡¡perhaps£»¡¡be¡¡found¡¡in¡¡that¡¡passage¡¡of
the¡¡Symposium¡¡in¡¡which¡¡Alcibiades¡¡describes¡¡himself¡¡as¡¡self¡convicted¡¡by
the¡¡words¡¡of¡¡Socrates¡£¡¡¡¡For¡¡the¡¡disparaging¡¡manner¡¡in¡¡which¡¡Schleiermacher
has¡¡spoken¡¡of¡¡this¡¡dialogue¡¡there¡¡seems¡¡to¡¡be¡¡no¡¡sufficient¡¡foundation¡£¡¡¡¡At
the¡¡same¡¡time£»¡¡the¡¡lesson¡¡imparted¡¡is¡¡simple£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡irony¡¡more
transparent¡¡than¡¡in¡¡the¡¡undoubted¡¡dialogues¡¡of¡¡Plato¡£¡¡¡¡We¡¡know£»¡¡too£»¡¡that
Alcibiades¡¡was¡¡a¡¡favourite¡¡thesis£»¡¡and¡¡that¡¡at¡¡least¡¡five¡¡or¡¡six¡¡dialogues
bearing¡¡this¡¡name¡¡passed¡¡current¡¡in¡¡antiquity£»¡¡and¡¡are¡¡attributed¡¡to
contemporaries¡¡of¡¡Socrates¡¡and¡¡Plato¡£¡¡¡¡£¨1£©¡¡In¡¡the¡¡entire¡¡absence¡¡of¡¡real
external¡¡evidence¡¡£¨for¡¡the¡¡catalogues¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Alexandrian¡¡librarians¡¡cannot
be¡¡regarded¡¡as¡¡trustworthy£©£»¡¡and¡¡£¨2£©¡¡in¡¡the¡¡absence¡¡of¡¡the¡¡highest¡¡marks
either¡¡of¡¡poetical¡¡or¡¡philosophical¡¡excellence£»¡¡and¡¡£¨3£©¡¡considering¡¡that¡¡we
have¡¡express¡¡testimony¡¡to¡¡the¡¡existence¡¡of¡¡contemporary¡¡writings¡¡bearing
the¡¡name¡¡of¡¡Alcibiades£»¡¡we¡¡are¡¡compelled¡¡to¡¡suspend¡¡our¡¡judgment¡¡on¡¡the
genuineness¡¡of¡¡the¡¡extant¡¡dialogue¡£
Neither¡¡at¡¡this¡¡point£»¡¡nor¡¡at¡¡any¡¡other£»¡¡do¡¡we¡¡propose¡¡to¡¡draw¡¡an¡¡absolute
line¡¡of¡¡demarcation¡¡between¡¡genuine¡¡and¡¡spurious¡¡writings¡¡of¡¡Plato¡£¡¡¡¡They
fade¡¡off¡¡imperceptibly¡¡from¡¡one¡¡class¡¡to¡¡another¡£¡¡¡¡There¡¡may¡¡have¡¡been
degrees¡¡of¡¡genuineness¡¡in¡¡the¡¡dialogues¡¡themselves£»¡¡as¡¡there¡¡are¡¡certainly
degrees¡¡of¡¡evidence¡¡by¡¡which¡¡they¡¡are¡¡supported¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡traditions¡¡of¡¡the
oral¡¡discourses¡¡both¡¡of¡¡Socrates¡¡and¡¡Plato¡¡may¡¡have¡¡formed¡¡the¡¡basis¡¡of
semi¡Platonic¡¡writings£»¡¡some¡¡of¡¡them¡¡may¡¡be¡¡of¡¡the¡¡same¡¡mixed¡¡character
which¡¡is¡¡apparent¡¡in¡¡Aristotle¡¡and¡¡Hippocrates£»¡¡although¡¡the¡¡form¡¡of¡¡them
is¡¡different¡£¡¡¡¡But¡¡the¡¡writings¡¡of¡¡Plato£»¡¡unlike¡¡the¡¡writings¡¡of¡¡Aristotle£»
seem¡¡never¡¡to¡¡have¡¡been¡¡confused¡¡with¡¡the¡¡writings¡¡of¡¡his¡¡disciples£º¡¡¡¡this
was¡¡probably¡¡due¡¡to¡¡their¡¡definite¡¡form£»¡¡and¡¡to¡¡their¡¡inimitable
excellence¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡three¡¡dialogues¡¡which¡¡we¡¡have¡¡offered¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Appendix¡¡to
the¡¡criticism¡¡of¡¡the¡¡reader¡¡may¡¡be¡¡partly¡¡spurious¡¡and¡¡partly¡¡genuine£»¡¡they
may¡¡be¡¡altogether¡¡spurious£»that¡¡is¡¡an¡¡alternative¡¡which¡¡must¡¡be¡¡frankly
admitted¡£¡¡¡¡Nor¡¡can¡¡we¡¡maintain¡¡of¡¡some¡¡other¡¡dialogues£»¡¡such¡¡as¡¡the
Parmenides£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡Sophist£»¡¡and¡¡Politicus£»¡¡that¡¡no¡¡considerable¡¡objection
can¡¡be¡¡urged¡¡against¡¡them£»¡¡though¡¡greatly¡¡overbalanced¡¡by¡¡the¡¡weight
£¨chiefly£©¡¡of¡¡internal¡¡evidence¡¡in¡¡their¡¡favour¡£¡¡¡¡Nor£»¡¡on¡¡the¡¡other¡¡hand£»
can¡¡we¡¡exclude¡¡a¡¡bare¡¡possibility¡¡that¡¡some¡¡dialogues¡¡which¡¡are¡¡usually
rejected£»¡¡such¡¡as¡¡the¡¡Greater¡¡Hippias¡¡and¡¡the¡¡Cleitophon£»¡¡may¡¡be¡¡genuine¡£¡¡
The¡¡nature¡¡and¡¡object¡¡of¡¡these¡¡semi¡Platonic¡¡writings¡¡require¡¡more¡¡careful
study¡¡and¡¡more¡¡comparison¡¡of¡¡them¡¡with¡¡one¡¡another£»¡¡and¡¡with¡¡forged
writings¡¡in¡¡general£»¡¡than¡¡they¡¡have¡¡yet¡¡received£»¡¡before¡¡we¡¡can¡¡finally
decide¡¡on¡¡their¡¡character¡£¡¡¡¡We¡¡do¡¡not¡¡consider¡¡them¡¡all¡¡as¡¡genuine¡¡until
they¡¡can¡¡be¡¡proved¡¡to¡¡be¡¡spurious£»¡¡as¡¡is¡¡often¡¡maintained¡¡and¡¡still¡¡more
often¡¡implied¡¡in¡¡this¡¡and¡¡similar¡¡discussions£»¡¡but¡¡should¡¡say¡¡of¡¡some¡¡of
them£»¡¡that¡¡their¡¡genuineness¡¡is¡¡neither¡¡proven¡¡nor¡¡disproven¡¡until¡¡further
evidence¡¡about¡¡them¡¡can¡¡be¡¡adduced¡£¡¡¡¡And¡¡we¡¡are¡¡as¡¡confident¡¡that¡¡the
Epistles¡¡are¡¡spurious£»¡¡as¡¡that¡¡the¡¡Republic£»¡¡the¡¡Timaeus£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡Laws¡¡are
genuine¡£
On¡¡the¡¡whole£»¡¡not¡¡a¡¡twentieth¡¡part¡¡of¡¡the¡¡writings¡¡which¡¡pass¡¡under¡¡the
name¡¡of¡¡Plato£»¡¡if¡¡we¡¡exclude¡¡the¡¡works¡¡rejected¡¡by¡¡the¡¡ancients¡¡themselves
and¡¡two¡¡or¡¡three¡¡other¡¡plausible¡¡inventions£»¡¡can¡¡be¡¡fairly¡¡doubted¡¡by¡¡those
who¡¡are¡¡willing¡¡to¡¡allow¡¡that¡¡a¡¡considerable¡¡change¡¡and¡¡growth¡¡may¡¡have
taken¡¡place¡¡in¡¡his¡¡philosophy¡¡£¨see¡¡above£©¡£¡¡¡¡That¡¡twentieth¡¡debatable
portion¡¡scarcely¡¡in¡¡any¡¡degree¡¡affects¡¡our¡¡judgment¡¡of¡¡Plato£»¡¡either¡¡as¡¡a
thinker¡¡or¡¡a¡¡writer£»¡¡and¡¡though¡¡suggesting¡¡some¡¡interesting¡¡questions¡¡to
the¡¡scholar¡¡and¡¡critic£»¡¡is¡¡of¡¡little¡¡importance¡¡to¡¡the¡¡general¡¡reader¡£
ALCIBIADES¡¡I
by
Plato¡¡£¨see¡¡Appendix¡¡I¡¡above£©
Translated¡¡by¡¡Benjamin¡¡Jowett
INTRODUCTION¡£
The¡¡First¡¡Alcibiades¡¡is¡¡a¡¡conversation¡¡between¡¡Socrates¡¡and¡¡Alcibiades¡£¡¡
Socrates¡¡is¡¡represented¡¡in¡¡the¡¡character¡¡which¡¡he¡¡attributes¡¡to¡¡himself¡¡in
the¡¡Apology¡¡of¡¡a¡¡know¡nothing¡¡who¡¡detects¡¡the¡¡conceit¡¡of¡¡knowledge¡¡in
others¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡two¡¡have¡¡met¡¡already¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Protagoras¡¡and¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Symposium£»
in¡¡the¡¡latter¡¡dialogue£»¡¡as¡¡in¡¡this£»¡¡the¡¡relation¡¡between¡¡them¡¡is¡¡that¡¡of¡¡a
lover¡¡and¡¡his¡¡beloved¡£¡¡¡¡But¡¡the¡¡narrative¡¡of¡¡their¡¡loves¡¡is¡¡told
differently¡¡in¡¡different¡¡places£»¡¡for¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Symposium¡¡Alcibiades¡¡is
depicted¡¡as¡¡the¡¡impassioned¡¡but¡¡rejected¡¡lover£»¡¡here£»¡¡as¡¡coldly¡¡receiving
the¡¡advances¡¡of¡¡Socrates£»¡¡who£»¡¡for¡¡the¡¡best¡¡of¡¡purposes£»¡¡lies¡¡in¡¡wait¡¡for
the¡¡aspiring¡¡and¡¡ambitious¡¡youth¡£
Alcibiades£»¡¡who¡¡is¡¡described¡¡as¡¡a¡¡very¡¡young¡¡man£»¡¡is¡¡about¡¡to¡¡enter¡¡on
public¡¡life£»¡¡having¡¡an¡¡inordinate¡¡opinion¡¡of¡¡himself£»¡¡and¡¡an¡¡extravagant
ambition¡£¡¡¡¡Socrates£»¡¡'who¡¡knows¡¡what¡¡is¡¡in¡¡man£»'¡¡astonishes¡¡him¡¡by¡¡a
revelation¡¡of¡¡his¡¡designs¡£¡¡¡¡But¡¡has¡¡he¡¡the¡¡knowledge¡¡which¡¡is¡¡necessary¡¡for
carrying¡¡them¡¡out£¿¡¡¡¡He¡¡is¡¡going¡¡to¡¡persuade¡¡the¡¡Atheniansabout¡¡what£¿¡¡¡¡Not
about¡¡any¡¡particular¡¡art£»¡¡but¡¡about¡¡politicswhen¡¡to¡¡fight¡¡and¡¡when¡¡to
make¡¡peace¡£¡¡¡¡Now£»¡¡men¡¡should¡¡fight¡¡and¡¡make¡¡peace¡¡on¡¡just¡¡grounds£»¡¡and
therefore¡¡the¡¡question¡¡of¡¡justice¡¡and¡¡injustice¡¡must¡¡enter¡¡into¡¡peace¡¡and
war£»¡¡and¡¡he¡¡who¡¡advises¡¡the¡¡Athenians¡¡must¡¡know¡¡the¡¡difference¡¡between
them¡£¡¡¡¡Does¡¡Alcibiades¡¡know£¿¡¡¡¡If¡¡he¡¡does£»¡¡he¡¡must¡¡either¡¡have¡¡been¡¡taught
by¡¡some¡¡master£»¡¡or¡¡he¡¡must¡¡have¡¡discovered¡¡the¡¡nature¡¡of¡¡them¡¡himself¡£¡¡¡¡If
he¡¡has¡¡had¡¡a¡¡master£»¡¡Socrates¡¡would¡¡like¡¡to¡¡be¡¡informed¡¡who¡¡he¡¡is£»¡¡that¡¡he
may¡¡go¡¡and¡¡learn¡¡of¡¡him¡¡also¡£¡¡¡¡Alcibiades¡¡admits¡¡that¡¡he¡¡has¡¡never¡¡learned¡£¡¡
Then¡¡has¡¡he¡¡enquired¡¡for¡¡himself£¿¡¡¡¡He¡¡may¡¡have£»¡¡if¡¡he¡¡was¡¡ever¡¡aware¡¡of¡¡a
time¡¡when¡¡he¡¡was¡¡ignorant¡£¡¡¡¡But¡¡he¡¡never¡¡was¡¡ignorant£»¡¡for¡¡when¡¡he¡¡played
with¡¡other¡¡boys¡¡at¡¡dice£»¡¡he¡¡charged¡¡them¡¡with¡¡cheating£»¡¡and¡¡this¡¡implied¡¡a
knowledge¡¡of¡¡just¡¡and¡¡unjust¡£¡¡¡¡According¡¡to¡¡his¡¡own¡¡explanation£»¡¡he¡¡had
learned¡¡of¡¡the¡¡multitude¡£¡¡¡¡Why£»¡¡he¡¡asks£»¡¡should¡¡he¡¡not¡¡learn¡¡of¡¡them¡¡the
nature¡¡of¡¡justice£»¡¡as¡¡he¡¡has¡¡learned¡¡the¡¡Greek¡¡language¡¡of¡¡them£¿¡¡¡¡To¡¡this
Socrates¡¡answers£»¡¡that¡¡they¡¡can¡¡teach¡¡Greek£»¡¡but¡¡they¡¡cannot¡¡teach¡¡justice£»
for¡¡they¡¡are¡¡agreed¡¡about¡¡the¡¡one£»¡¡but¡¡they¡¡are¡¡not¡¡agreed¡¡about¡¡the¡¡other£º¡¡
and¡¡therefore¡¡Alcibiades£»¡¡who¡¡has¡¡admitted¡¡that¡¡if¡¡he¡¡knows¡¡he¡¡must¡¡either
have¡¡learned¡¡from¡¡a¡¡master¡¡or¡¡have¡¡discovered¡¡for¡¡himself¡¡the¡¡nature¡¡of
justice£»¡¡is¡¡convicted¡¡out¡¡of¡¡his¡¡own¡¡mouth¡£
Alcibiades¡¡rejoins£»¡¡that¡¡the¡¡Athenians¡¡debate¡¡not¡¡about¡¡what¡¡is¡¡just£»¡¡but
about¡¡what¡¡is¡¡expedient£»¡¡and¡¡he¡¡asserts¡¡that¡¡the¡¡two¡¡principles¡¡of¡¡justice
and¡¡expediency¡¡are¡¡opposed¡£¡¡¡¡Socrates£»¡¡by¡¡a¡¡series¡¡of¡¡questions£»¡¡compels
him¡¡to¡¡admit¡¡that¡¡the¡¡just¡¡and¡¡the¡¡expedient¡¡coincide¡£¡¡¡¡Alcibiades¡¡is¡¡thus
reduced¡¡to¡¡the¡¡humiliating¡¡conclusion¡¡that¡¡he¡¡knows¡¡nothing¡¡of¡¡politics£»
even¡¡if£»¡¡as¡¡he¡¡says£»¡¡they¡¡are¡¡concerned¡¡with¡¡the¡¡expedient¡£
However£»¡¡he¡¡is¡¡no¡¡worse¡¡than¡¡other¡¡Athenian¡¡statesmen£»¡¡and¡¡he¡¡will¡¡not¡¡need
training£»¡¡for¡¡others¡¡are¡¡as¡¡ignorant¡¡as¡¡he¡¡is¡£¡¡¡¡He¡¡is¡¡reminded¡¡that¡¡he¡¡has
to¡¡contend£»¡¡not¡¡only¡¡with¡¡his¡¡own¡¡countrymen£»¡¡but¡¡with¡¡their¡¡enemieswith
the¡¡Spartan¡¡king
СÌáʾ£º°´ »Ø³µ [Enter] ¼ü ·µ»ØÊéÄ¿£¬°´ ¡û ¼ü ·µ»ØÉÏÒ»Ò³£¬ °´ ¡ú ¼ü ½øÈëÏÂÒ»Ò³¡£
ÔÞÒ»ÏÂ
Ìí¼ÓÊéÇ©¼ÓÈëÊé¼Ü