¡¶darwin and modern science¡·

ÏÂÔر¾Êé

Ìí¼ÓÊéÇ©

darwin and modern science- µÚ175²¿·Ö


°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡û »ò ¡ú ¿É¿ìËÙÉÏÏ·­Ò³£¬°´¼üÅÌÉ쵀 Enter ¼ü¿É»Øµ½±¾ÊéĿ¼ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡ü ¿É»Øµ½±¾Ò³¶¥²¿£¡
¡¡which¡¡the¡¡names¡¡of¡¡uranium¡­X¡¡and¡¡thorium¡­X¡¡have¡¡been¡¡given¡£¡¡¡¡These¡¡bodies¡¡behave¡¡differently¡¡from¡¡their¡¡parents¡¡uranium¡¡and¡¡thorium£»¡¡and¡¡show¡¡all¡¡the¡¡signs¡¡of¡¡distinct¡¡chemical¡¡individuality¡£¡¡¡¡They¡¡are¡¡strongly¡¡radio¡­active£»¡¡while£»¡¡after¡¡the¡¡separation£»¡¡the¡¡parents¡¡uranium¡¡and¡¡thorium¡¡are¡¡found¡¡to¡¡have¡¡lost¡¡some¡¡of¡¡their¡¡radio¡­activity¡£¡¡¡¡If¡¡the¡¡X¡­substances¡¡be¡¡kept£»¡¡their¡¡radio¡­activity¡¡decays£»¡¡while¡¡that¡¡of¡¡the¡¡uranium¡¡or¡¡thorium¡¡from¡¡which¡¡they¡¡were¡¡obtained¡¡gradually¡¡rises¡¡to¡¡the¡¡initial¡¡value¡¡it¡¡had¡¡before¡¡the¡¡separation¡£¡¡¡¡At¡¡any¡¡moment£»¡¡the¡¡sum¡¡of¡¡the¡¡radio¡­activity¡¡is¡¡constant£»¡¡the¡¡activity¡¡lost¡¡by¡¡the¡¡product¡¡being¡¡equal¡¡to¡¡that¡¡gained¡¡by¡¡the¡¡parent¡¡substance¡£¡¡¡¡These¡¡phenomena¡¡are¡¡explained¡¡if¡¡we¡¡suppose¡¡that¡¡the¡¡X¡­product¡¡is¡¡slowly¡¡produced¡¡in¡¡the¡¡substance¡¡of¡¡the¡¡parent£»¡¡and¡¡decays¡¡at¡¡a¡¡constant¡¡rate¡£¡¡¡¡Uranium£»¡¡as¡¡usually¡¡seen£»¡¡contains¡¡a¡¡certain¡¡amount¡¡of¡¡uranium¡­X£»¡¡and¡¡its¡¡radio¡­activity¡¡consists¡¡of¡¡two¡¡partsthat¡¡of¡¡the¡¡uranium¡¡itself£»¡¡and¡¡that¡¡of¡¡the¡¡X¡¡product¡£¡¡¡¡When¡¡the¡¡latter¡¡is¡¡separated¡¡by¡¡means¡¡of¡¡its¡¡chemical¡¡reactions£»¡¡its¡¡radio¡­activity¡¡is¡¡separated¡¡also£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡rates¡¡of¡¡decay¡¡and¡¡recovery¡¡may¡¡be¡¡examined¡£

Radium¡¡and¡¡thorium£»¡¡but¡¡not¡¡uranium£»¡¡give¡¡rise¡¡to¡¡radio¡­active¡¡gases¡¡which¡¡have¡¡been¡¡called¡¡emanations¡£¡¡¡¡Rutherford¡¡has¡¡shown¡¡that¡¡their¡¡radio¡­¡¡activity£»¡¡like¡¡that¡¡of¡¡the¡¡X¡¡products£»¡¡suffers¡¡decay£»¡¡while¡¡the¡¡walls¡¡of¡¡the¡¡vessel¡¡in¡¡which¡¡the¡¡emanation¡¡is¡¡confined£»¡¡become¡¡themselves¡¡radio¡­¡¡active¡£¡¡¡¡If¡¡washed¡¡with¡¡certain¡¡acids£»¡¡however£»¡¡the¡¡walls¡¡lose¡¡their¡¡activity£»¡¡which¡¡is¡¡transferred¡¡to¡¡the¡¡acid£»¡¡and¡¡can¡¡be¡¡deposited¡¡by¡¡evaporation¡¡from¡¡it¡¡on¡¡to¡¡a¡¡solid¡¡surface¡£¡¡¡¡Here¡¡again¡¡it¡¡is¡¡clear¡¡that¡¡the¡¡emanation¡¡gives¡¡rise¡¡to¡¡a¡¡radio¡­active¡¡substance¡¡which¡¡clings¡¡to¡¡the¡¡walls¡¡of¡¡the¡¡vessel£»¡¡and¡¡is¡¡soluble¡¡in¡¡certain¡¡liquids£»¡¡but¡¡not¡¡in¡¡others¡£

We¡¡shall¡¡return¡¡to¡¡this¡¡point£»¡¡and¡¡trace¡¡farther¡¡the¡¡history¡¡of¡¡the¡¡radio¡­¡¡active¡¡matter¡£¡¡¡¡At¡¡present¡¡we¡¡wish¡¡to¡¡emphasise¡¡the¡¡fact¡¡that£»¡¡as¡¡in¡¡other¡¡cases£»¡¡the¡¡radio¡­activity¡¡of¡¡the¡¡emanation¡¡is¡¡accompanied¡¡by¡¡the¡¡appearance¡¡of¡¡a¡¡new¡¡kind¡¡of¡¡substance¡¡with¡¡distinct¡¡chemical¡¡properties¡£

We¡¡are¡¡now¡¡in¡¡a¡¡position¡¡to¡¡consider¡¡as¡¡a¡¡whole¡¡the¡¡evidence¡¡on¡¡the¡¡question¡¡of¡¡the¡¡source¡¡of¡¡radio¡­active¡¡energy¡£

£¨1£©¡¡¡¡Radio¡­activity¡¡is¡¡accompanied¡¡by¡¡the¡¡appearance¡¡of¡¡new¡¡chemical¡¡substances¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡energy¡¡liberated¡¡is¡¡therefore¡¡probably¡¡due¡¡to¡¡the¡¡associated¡¡chemical¡¡change¡£¡¡¡¡£¨2£©¡¡¡¡The¡¡activity¡¡of¡¡a¡¡series¡¡of¡¡compounds¡¡is¡¡found¡¡to¡¡accompany¡¡the¡¡presence¡¡of¡¡a¡¡radio¡­active¡¡element£»¡¡the¡¡activity¡¡of¡¡each¡¡compound¡¡depends¡¡only¡¡on¡¡the¡¡contents¡¡of¡¡the¡¡element£»¡¡and¡¡is¡¡independent¡¡of¡¡the¡¡nature¡¡of¡¡its¡¡combination¡£¡¡¡¡Thus¡¡radio¡­activity¡¡is¡¡a¡¡property¡¡of¡¡the¡¡element£»¡¡and¡¡is¡¡not¡¡affected¡¡by¡¡its¡¡state¡¡of¡¡isolation¡¡or¡¡chemical¡¡combination¡£¡¡£¨3£©¡¡¡¡The¡¡radio¡­activity¡¡of¡¡a¡¡simple¡¡transient¡¡product¡¡decays¡¡in¡¡a¡¡geometrical¡¡progression£»¡¡the¡¡loss¡¡per¡¡second¡¡being¡¡proportional¡¡to¡¡the¡¡mass¡¡of¡¡substance¡¡still¡¡left¡¡at¡¡the¡¡moment£»¡¡and¡¡independent¡¡of¡¡its¡¡state¡¡of¡¡concentration¡¡or¡¡dilution¡£¡¡¡¡This¡¡type¡¡of¡¡reaction¡¡is¡¡well¡¡known¡¡in¡¡chemistry¡¡to¡¡mark¡¡a¡¡mono¡­molecular¡¡change£»¡¡where¡¡each¡¡molecule¡¡is¡¡dissociated¡¡or¡¡altered¡¡in¡¡structure¡¡independently¡£¡¡¡¡If¡¡two¡¡or¡¡more¡¡molecules¡¡were¡¡concerned¡¡simultaneously£»¡¡the¡¡rate¡¡of¡¡reaction¡¡would¡¡depend¡¡on¡¡the¡¡nearness¡¡of¡¡the¡¡molecules¡¡to¡¡each¡¡other£»¡¡that¡¡is£»¡¡to¡¡the¡¡concentration¡¡of¡¡the¡¡material¡£¡¡¡¡£¨4£©¡¡¡¡The¡¡amount¡¡of¡¡energy¡¡liberated¡¡by¡¡the¡¡change¡¡of¡¡a¡¡given¡¡mass¡¡of¡¡material¡¡far¡¡transcends¡¡the¡¡amount¡¡set¡¡free¡¡by¡¡any¡¡known¡¡ordinary¡¡chemical¡¡action¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡activity¡¡of¡¡radium¡¡decays¡¡so¡¡slowly¡¡that¡¡it¡¡would¡¡not¡¡sink¡¡to¡¡half¡¡its¡¡initial¡¡value¡¡in¡¡less¡¡than¡¡some¡¡two¡¡thousand¡¡years£»¡¡and¡¡yet¡¡one¡¡gramme¡¡of¡¡radium¡¡emits¡¡about¡¡100¡¡calories¡¡of¡¡heat¡¡during¡¡each¡¡hour¡¡of¡¡its¡¡existence¡£

The¡¡energy¡¡of¡¡radio¡­activity¡¡is¡¡due¡¡to¡¡chemical¡¡change£»¡¡but¡¡clearly¡¡to¡¡no¡¡chemical¡¡change¡¡hitherto¡¡familiar¡¡to¡¡science¡£¡¡¡¡It¡¡is¡¡an¡¡atomic¡¡property£»¡¡characteristic¡¡of¡¡a¡¡given¡¡element£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡atoms¡¡undergo¡¡the¡¡change¡¡individually£»¡¡not¡¡by¡¡means¡¡of¡¡interaction¡¡among¡¡each¡¡other¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡conclusion¡¡is¡¡irresistible¡¡that¡¡we¡¡are¡¡dealing¡¡with¡¡a¡¡fundamental¡¡change¡¡in¡¡the¡¡structure¡¡of¡¡the¡¡individual¡¡atoms£»¡¡which£»¡¡one¡¡by¡¡one£»¡¡are¡¡dissociating¡¡into¡¡simpler¡¡parts¡£¡¡¡¡We¡¡are¡¡watching¡¡the¡¡disintegration¡¡of¡¡the¡¡¡¨atoms¡¨¡¡of¡¡the¡¡chemist£»¡¡hitherto¡¡believed¡¡indestructible¡¡and¡¡eternal£»¡¡and¡¡measuring¡¡the¡¡liberation¡¡of¡¡some¡¡of¡¡the¡¡long¡­suspected¡¡store¡¡of¡¡internal¡¡atomic¡¡energy¡£¡¡¡¡We¡¡have¡¡stumbled¡¡on¡¡the¡¡transmutation¡¡dreamed¡¡by¡¡the¡¡alchemist£»¡¡and¡¡discovered¡¡the¡¡process¡¡of¡¡a¡¡veritable¡¡evolution¡¡of¡¡matter¡£

The¡¡transmutation¡¡theory¡¡of¡¡radio¡­activity¡¡was¡¡formulated¡¡by¡¡Rutherford¡¡£¨Rutherford£»¡¡¡¨Radio¡­activity¡¨¡¡£¨2nd¡¡edition£©£»¡¡Cambridge£»¡¡1905£»¡¡page¡¡307¡££©¡¡and¡¡Soddy¡¡in¡¡1903¡£¡¡¡¡By¡¡its¡¡light£»¡¡all¡¡recent¡¡work¡¡on¡¡the¡¡subject¡¡has¡¡been¡¡guided£»¡¡it¡¡has¡¡stood¡¡the¡¡supreme¡¡test¡¡of¡¡a¡¡hypothesis£»¡¡and¡¡shown¡¡power¡¡to¡¡suggest¡¡new¡¡investigations¡¡and¡¡to¡¡co¡­ordinate¡¡and¡¡explain¡¡them£»¡¡when¡¡carried¡¡out¡£¡¡¡¡We¡¡have¡¡summarised¡¡the¡¡evidence¡¡which¡¡led¡¡to¡¡the¡¡conception¡¡of¡¡the¡¡theory£»¡¡we¡¡have¡¡now¡¡to¡¡consider¡¡the¡¡progress¡¡which¡¡has¡¡been¡¡made¡¡in¡¡tracing¡¡the¡¡successive¡¡disintegration¡¡of¡¡radio¡­active¡¡atoms¡£

Soon¡¡after¡¡the¡¡statement¡¡of¡¡the¡¡transmutation¡¡theory£»¡¡a¡¡striking¡¡verification¡¡of¡¡one¡¡of¡¡its¡¡consequences¡¡appeared¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡measurement¡¡of¡¡the¡¡magnetic¡¡and¡¡electric¡¡deflection¡¡of¡¡the¡¡alpha¡­rays¡¡suggested¡¡to¡¡Rutherford¡¡the¡¡idea¡¡that¡¡the¡¡stream¡¡of¡¡projectiles¡¡of¡¡which¡¡they¡¡consisted¡¡was¡¡a¡¡flight¡¡of¡¡helium¡¡atoms¡£¡¡¡¡Ramsay¡¡and¡¡Soddy£»¡¡confining¡¡a¡¡minute¡¡bubble¡¡of¡¡radium¡¡emanation¡¡in¡¡a¡¡fine¡¡glass¡¡tube£»¡¡were¡¡able¡¡to¡¡watch¡¡the¡¡development¡¡of¡¡the¡¡helium¡¡spectrum¡¡as£»¡¡day¡¡by¡¡day£»¡¡the¡¡emanation¡¡decayed¡£¡¡¡¡By¡¡isolating¡¡a¡¡very¡¡narrow¡¡pencil¡¡of¡¡alpha¡­rays£»¡¡and¡¡watching¡¡through¡¡a¡¡microscope¡¡their¡¡impact¡¡on¡¡a¡¡fluorescent¡¡screen£»¡¡Rutherford¡¡has¡¡lately¡¡counted¡¡the¡¡individual¡¡alpha¡­projectiles£»¡¡and¡¡confirmed¡¡his¡¡original¡¡conclusion¡¡that¡¡their¡¡mass¡¡corresponded¡¡to¡¡that¡¡of¡¡helium¡¡atoms¡¡and¡¡their¡¡charge¡¡to¡¡double¡¡that¡¡on¡¡a¡¡univalent¡¡atom¡£¡¡¡¡£¨¡¨Proc¡£¡¡Roy¡£¡¡Soc¡£¡¨¡¡A£»¡¡page¡¡141£»¡¡1908¡££©¡¡¡¡Still¡¡more¡¡recently£»¡¡he¡¡has¡¡collected¡¡the¡¡alpha¡­particles¡¡shot¡¡through¡¡an¡¡extremely¡¡thin¡¡wall¡¡of¡¡glass£»¡¡and¡¡demonstrated¡¡by¡¡direct¡¡spectroscopic¡¡evidence¡¡the¡¡presence¡¡of¡¡helium¡£¡¡¡¡£¨¡¨Phil¡£¡¡Mag¡£¡¨¡¡February¡¡1909¡££©

But¡¡the¡¡most¡¡thorough¡¡investigation¡¡of¡¡a¡¡radio¡­active¡¡pedigree¡¡is¡¡found¡¡in¡¡Rutherford's¡¡classical¡¡researches¡¡on¡¡the¡¡successive¡¡disintegration¡¡products¡¡of¡¡radium£»¡¡in¡¡order¡¡to¡¡follow¡¡the¡¡evidence¡¡on¡¡which¡¡his¡¡results¡¡are¡¡founded£»¡¡we¡¡must¡¡describe¡¡more¡¡fully¡¡the¡¡process¡¡of¡¡decay¡¡of¡¡the¡¡activity¡¡of¡¡a¡¡simple¡¡radio¡­active¡¡substance¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡decay¡¡of¡¡activity¡¡of¡¡the¡¡body¡¡known¡¡as¡¡uranium¡­X¡¡is¡¡shown¡¡in¡¡a¡¡falling¡¡curve¡¡£¨Fig¡£¡¡1¡££©¡£¡¡¡¡It¡¡will¡¡be¡¡seen¡¡that£»¡¡in¡¡each¡¡successive¡¡22¡¡days£»¡¡the¡¡activity¡¡falls¡¡to¡¡half¡¡the¡¡value¡¡it¡¡possessed¡¡at¡¡the¡¡beginning¡£

This¡¡change¡¡in¡¡a¡¡geometrical¡¡progression¡¡is¡¡characteristic¡¡of¡¡simple¡¡radio¡­¡¡active¡¡processes£»¡¡and¡¡can¡¡be¡¡expressed¡¡mathematically¡¡by¡¡a¡¡simple¡¡exponential¡¡formula¡£

As¡¡we¡¡have¡¡said¡¡above£»¡¡solid¡¡bodies¡¡exposed¡¡to¡¡the¡¡emanations¡¡of¡¡radium¡¡or¡¡thorium¡¡become¡¡coated¡¡with¡¡a¡¡radio¡­active¡¡deposit¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡rate¡¡of¡¡decay¡¡of¡¡this¡¡activity¡¡depends¡¡on¡¡the¡¡time¡¡of¡¡exposure¡¡to¡¡the¡¡emanation£»¡¡and¡¡does¡¡not¡¡always¡¡show¡¡the¡¡usual¡¡simple¡¡type¡¡of¡¡curve¡£¡¡¡¡Thus¡¡the¡¡activity¡¡of¡¡a¡¡rod¡¡exposed¡¡to¡¡radium¡¡emanation¡¡for¡¡1¡¡minute¡¡decays¡¡in¡¡accordance¡¡with¡¡a¡¡curve¡¡£¨Fig¡£¡¡2£©¡¡which¡¡represents¡¡the¡¡activity¡¡as¡¡measured¡¡by¡¡the¡¡alpha¡­rays¡£¡¡¡¡If¡¡the¡¡electroscope¡¡be¡¡screened¡¡from¡¡the¡¡alpha¡­rays£»¡¡it¡¡is¡¡found¡¡that¡¡the¡¡activity¡¡of¡¡the¡¡rod¡¡in¡¡beta¡­¡¡an¡¡gamma¡­rays¡¡increases¡¡for¡¡some¡¡35¡¡minutes¡¡and¡¡then¡¡diminishes¡¡£¨Fig¡£¡¡3¡££©¡£

These¡¡complicated¡¡relations¡¡have¡¡been¡¡explained¡¡satisfactorily¡¡and¡¡completely¡¡by¡¡Rutherford¡¡on¡¡the¡¡hypothesis¡¡of¡¡successive¡¡changes¡¡of¡¡the¡¡radio¡­active¡¡matter¡¡into¡¡one¡¡new¡¡body¡¡after¡¡another¡£¡¡¡¡£¨Rutherford£»¡¡¡¨Radio¡­¡¡activity¡¨¡¡£¨2nd¡¡edition£©£»¡¡Cambridge£»¡¡1905£»¡¡page¡¡379¡££©¡¡¡¡The¡¡experimental¡¡curve¡¡represents¡¡the¡¡resultant¡¡activity¡¡of¡¡all¡¡the¡¡matter¡¡present¡¡at¡¡a¡¡given¡¡moment£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡process¡¡of¡¡disentangling¡¡the¡¡component¡¡effects¡¡consists¡¡in¡¡finding¡¡a¡¡number¡¡of¡¡curves£»¡¡which¡¡express¡¡the¡¡rise¡¡and¡¡fall¡¡of¡¡activity¡¡of¡¡each¡¡kind¡¡of¡¡matter¡¡as¡¡it¡¡is¡¡produced¡¡and¡¡decays£»¡¡and£»¡¡fitted¡¡together£»¡¡give¡¡the¡¡curve¡¡of¡¡the¡¡experiments¡£

Other¡¡methods¡¡of¡¡investigation¡¡also¡¡are¡¡open¡£¡¡¡¡They¡¡have¡¡enabled¡¡Rutherford¡¡to¡¡complete¡¡the¡¡life¡­history¡¡of¡¡radium¡¡and¡¡its¡¡products£»¡¡and¡¡to¡¡clear¡¡up¡¡doubtful¡¡points¡¡left¡¡by¡¡the¡¡analysis¡¡of¡¡the¡¡curves¡£¡¡¡¡By¡¡the¡¡removal¡¡of¡¡the¡¡emanation£»¡¡the¡¡activity¡¡of¡¡radium¡¡itself¡¡has¡¡been¡¡shown¡¡to¡¡consist¡¡solely¡¡of¡¡alpha¡­rays¡£¡¡¡¡This¡¡removal¡¡can¡¡be¡¡effected¡¡by¡¡passing¡¡air¡¡through¡¡the¡¡solution¡¡of¡¡a¡¡radium¡¡salt¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡emanation¡¡comes¡¡away£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡activity¡¡of¡¡the¡¡deposit¡¡which¡¡it¡¡leaves¡¡behind¡¡decays¡¡rapidly¡¡to¡¡a¡¡small¡¡fraction¡¡of¡¡its¡¡initial¡¡value¡£¡¡¡¡Again£»¡¡some¡¡of¡¡the¡¡active¡¡deposits¡¡of¡¡the¡¡emanation¡¡are¡¡more¡¡volatile¡¡than¡¡others£»¡¡and¡¡can¡¡be¡¡separated¡¡from¡¡them¡¡by¡¡the¡¡agency¡¡of¡¡heat¡£

From¡¡such¡¡evidence¡¡Rutherford¡¡has¡¡traced¡¡a¡¡long¡¡series¡¡of¡¡disintegration¡¡products¡¡of¡¡radium£»¡¡all¡¡but¡¡the¡¡first¡¡of¡¡which¡¡exist¡¡in¡¡much¡¡too¡¡minute¡¡quantities¡¡to¡¡be¡¡detected¡¡otherwise¡¡than¡¡by¡¡their¡¡radio¡­activities¡£¡¡¡¡Moreover£»¡¡two¡¡of¡¡these¡¡products¡¡are¡¡not¡¡themselves¡¡appreciably¡¡radio¡­¡¡active£»¡¡though¡¡they¡¡are¡¡born¡¡from¡¡radio¡­active¡¡parents£»¡¡and¡¡give¡¡rise¡¡to¡¡a¡¡series¡¡of¡¡radio¡­active¡¡descendants¡£¡¡¡¡Their¡¡presence¡¡is¡¡inferred¡¡from¡¡such¡¡evidence¡¡as¡¡the¡¡rise¡¡of¡¡beta¡¡and¡¡gamma¡¡radio¡­activity¡¡in¡¡the¡¡solid¡¡newly¡¡deposited¡¡by¡¡the¡¡emanation£»¡¡this¡¡rise¡¡measuring¡¡t
СÌáʾ£º°´ »Ø³µ [Enter] ¼ü ·µ»ØÊéÄ¿£¬°´ ¡û ¼ü ·µ»ØÉÏÒ»Ò³£¬ °´ ¡ú ¼ü ½øÈëÏÂÒ»Ò³¡£ ÔÞһϠÌí¼ÓÊéÇ©¼ÓÈëÊé¼Ü