nsion of elective offices： if these two institutions do not go hand in hand； the State must fall into anarchy or into subjection。
It has always been remarked that habits of legal business do not render men apt to the exercise of administrative authority。 The Americans have borrowed from the English； their fathers； the idea of an institution which is unknown upon the continent of Europe： I allude to that of the Justices of the Peace。 The Justice of the Peace is a sort of mezzo termine between the magistrate and the man of the world； between the civil officer and the judge。 A justice of the peace is a well…informed citizen； though he is not necessarily versed in the knowledge of the laws。 His office simply obliges him to execute the police regulations of society； a task in which good sense and integrity are of more avail than legal science。 The justice introduces into the administration a certain taste for established forms and publicity； which renders him a most unserviceable instrument of despotism； and； on the other hand； he is not blinded by those superstitions which render legal officers unfit members of a government。 The Americans have adopted the system of the English justices of the peace； but they have deprived it of that aristocratic character which is discernible in the mother…country。 The Governor of Massachusetts *p appoints a certain number of justices of the peace in every county； whose functions last seven years。 *q He further designates three individuals from amongst the whole body of justices who form in each county what is called the Court of Sessions。 The justices take a personal share in public business； they are sometimes entrusted with administrative functions in conjunction with elected officers； *r they sometimes constitute a tribunal； before which the magistrates summarily prosecute a refractory citizen； or the citizens inform against the abuses of the magistrate。 But it is in the Court of Sessions that they exercise their most important functions。 This court meets twice a year in the county town； in Massachusetts it is empowered to enforce the obedience of the greater number *s of public officers。 *t It must be observed； that in the State of Massachusetts the Court of Sessions is at the same time an administrative body； properly so called； and a political tribunal。 It has been asserted that the county is a purely administrative division。 The Court of Sessions presides over that small number of affairs which； as they concern several townships； or all the townships of the county in common； cannot be entrusted to any one of them in particular。 *u In all that concerns county business the duties of the Court of Sessions are purely administrative； and if in its investigations it occasionally borrows the forms of judicial procedure； it is only with a view to its own information； *v or as a guarantee to the community over which it presides。 But when the administration of the township is brought before it； it always acts as a judicial body； and in some few cases as an official assembly。
＇Footnote p： We shall hereafter learn what a Governor is： I shall content myself with remarking in this place that he represents the executive power of the whole State。＇
＇Footnote q： See the Constitution of Massachusetts； chap。 II。 sect。 1。 Section 9； chap。 III。 Section 3。＇
＇Footnote r： Thus； for example； a stranger arrives in a township from a country where a contagious disease prevails； and he falls ill。 Two justices of the peace can； with the assent of the selectmen； order the sheriff of the county to remove and take care of him。 … Act of June 22； 1797； vol。 i。 p。 540。
In general the justices interfere in all the important acts of the administration； and give them a semi…judicial character。＇ ＇Footnote s： I say the greater number； because certain administrative misdemeanors are brought before ordinary tribunals。 If； for instance； a township refuses to make the necessary expenditure for its schools or to name a school…committee； it is liable to a heavy fine。 But this penalty is pronounced by the Supreme Judicial Court or the Court of Common Pleas。 See Act of March 10； 1827； Laws of Massachusetts； vol。 iii。 p。 190。 Or when a township neglects to provide the necessary war…stores。 … Act of February 21； 1822： Id。； vol。 ii。 p。 570。＇
＇Footnote t： In their individual capacity the justices of the peace take a part in the business of the counties and townships。＇ ＇Footnote u： These affairs may be brought under the following heads： … 1。 The erection of prisons and courts of justice。 2。 The county budget； which is afterwards voted by the State。 3。 The distribution of the taxes so voted。 4。 Grants of certain patents。 5。 The laying down and repairs of the country roads。＇
＇Footnote v： Thus； when a road is under consideration； almost all difficulties are disposed of by the aid of the jury。＇
The first difficulty is to procure the obedience of an authority as entirely independent of the general laws of the State as the township is。 We have stated that assessors are annually named by the town…meetings to levy the taxes。 If a township attempts to evade the payment of the taxes by neglecting to name its assessors； the Court of Sessions condemns it to a heavy penalty。 *w The fine is levied on each of the inhabitants； and the sheriff of the county； who is the officer of justice； executes the mandate。 Thus it is that in the United States the authority of the Government is mysteriously concealed under the forms of a judicial sentence； and its influence is at the same time fortified by that irresistible power with which men have invested the formalities of law。
＇Footnote w： See Act of February 20； 1786； Laws of Massachusetts； vol。 i。 p。 217。＇
These proceedings are easy to follow and to understand。 The demands made upon a township are in general plain and accurately defined； they consist in a simple fact without any complication； or in a principle without its application in detail。 *x But the difficulty increases when it is not the obedience of the township； but that of the town officers which is to be enforced。 All the reprehensible actions of which a public functionary may be guilty are reducible to the following heads：
＇Footnote x： There is an indirect method of enforcing the obedience of a township。 Suppose that the funds which the law demands for the maintenance of the roads have not been voted； the town surveyor is then authorized； ex officio； to levy the supplies。 As he is personally responsible to private individuals for the state of the roads； and indictable before the Court of Sessions； he is sure to employ the extraordinary right which the law gives him against the township。 Thus by threatening the officer the Court of Sessions exacts compliance from the town。 See Act of March 5； 1787； Id。； vol。 i。 p。 305。＇
He may execute the law without energy or zeal；
He may neglect to execute the law；
He may do what the law enjoins him not to do。
The last two violations of duty can alone come under the cognizance of a tribunal； a positive and appreciable fact is the indispensable foundation of an action at law。 Thus； if the selectmen omit to fulfil the legal formalities usual at town elections； they may be condemned to pay a fine； *y but when the public officer performs his duty without ability； and when he obeys the letter of the law without zeal or energy； he is at least beyond the reach of judicial interference。 The Court of Sessions； even when it is invested with its official powers； is in this case unable to compel him to a more satisfactory obedience。 The fear of removal is the only check to these quasi…offences； and as the Court of Sessions does not originate the town authorities； it cannot remove functionaries whom it does not appoint。 Moreover； a perpetual investigation would be necessary to convict the officer of negligence or lukewarmness； and the Court of Sessions sits but twice a year and then only judges such offences as are brought before its notice。 The only security of that active and enlightened obedience which a court of justice cannot impose upon public officers lies in the possibility of their arbitrary removal。 In France this security is sought for in powers exercised by the heads of the administration； in America it is sought for in the principle of election。
＇Footnote y： Laws of Massachusetts； vol。 ii。 p。 45。＇
Thus； to recapitulate in a few words what I have been showing： If a public officer in New England commits a crime in the exercise of his functions； the ordinary courts of justice are always called upon to pass sentence upon him。 If he commits a fault in his official capacity； a purely administrative tribunal is empowered to punish him； and； if the affair is important or urgent； the judge supplies the omission of the functionary。 *z Lastly； if the same individual is guilty of one of those intangible offences of which human justice has no cognizance； he annually appears before a tribunal from which there is no appeal； which can at once reduce him to insignificance and deprive him of his charge。 This system undoubtedly possesses great advantages； but its execution is attended with a practical difficulty which it is important to point out。
＇Footnote z： If；