other part of this work I shall attempt to determinate the degree of influence which the liberty of the press has exercised upon civil society in the United States； and to point out the direction which it has given to the ideas； as well as the tone which it has imparted to the character and the feelings； of the Anglo…Americans； but at present I purpose simply to examine the effects produced by the liberty of the press in the political world。
I confess that I do not entertain that firm and complete attachment to the liberty of the press which things that are supremely good in their very nature are wont to excite in the mind； and I approve of it more from a recollection of the evils it prevents than from a consideration of the advantages it ensures。
If any one could point out an intermediate and yet a tenable position between the complete independence and the entire subjection of the public expression of opinion； I should perhaps be inclined to adopt it； but the difficulty is to discover this position。 If it is your intention to correct the abuses of unlicensed printing and to restore the use of orderly language； you may in the first instance try the offender by a jury； but if the jury acquits him； the opinion which was that of a single individual becomes the opinion of the country at large。 Too much and too little has therefore hitherto been done。 If you proceed； you must bring the delinquent before a court of permanent judges。 But even here the cause must be heard before it can be decided； and the very principles which no book would have ventured to avow are blazoned forth in the pleadings； and what was obscurely hinted at in a single composition is then repeated in a multitude of other publications。 The language in which a thought is embodied is the mere carcass of the thought； and not the idea itself； tribunals may condemn the form； but the sense and spirit of the work is too subtle for their authority。 Too much has still been done to recede； too little to attain your end； you must therefore proceed。 If you establish a censorship of the press； the tongue of the public speaker will still make itself heard； and you have only increased the mischief。 The powers of thought do not rely； like the powers of physical strength； upon the number of their mechanical agents； nor can a host of authors be reckoned like the troops which compose an army； on the contrary； the authority of a principle is often increased by the smallness of the number of men by whom it is expressed。 The words of a strong…minded man； which penetrate amidst the passions of a listening assembly； have more power than the vociferations of a thousand orators； and if it be allowed to speak freely in any public place； the consequence is the same as if free speaking was allowed in every village。 The liberty of discourse must therefore be destroyed as well as the liberty of the press； this is the necessary term of your efforts； but if your object was to repress the abuses of liberty； they have brought you to the feet of a despot。 You have been led from the extreme of independence to the extreme of subjection without meeting with a single tenable position for shelter or repose。
There are certain nations which have peculiar reasons for cherishing the liberty of the press； independently of the general motives which I have just pointed out。 For in certain countries which profess to enjoy the privileges of freedom every individual agent of the Government may violate the laws with impunity； since those whom he oppresses cannot prosecute him before the courts of justice。 In this case the liberty of the press is not merely a guarantee； but it is the only guarantee； of their liberty and their security which the citizens possess。 If the rulers of these nations propose to abolish the independence of the press； the people would be justified in saying： Give us the right of prosecuting your offences before the ordinary tribunals； and perhaps we may then waive our right of appeal to the tribunal of public opinion。
But in the countries in which the doctrine of the sovereignty of the people ostensibly prevails； the censorship of the press is not only dangerous； but it is absurd。 When the right of every citizen to co…operate in the government of society is acknowledged； every citizen must be presumed to possess the power of discriminating between the different opinions of his contemporaries； and of appreciating the different facts from which inferences may be drawn。 The sovereignty of the people and the liberty of the press may therefore be looked upon as correlative institutions； just as the censorship of the press and universal suffrage are two things which are irreconcilably opposed； and which cannot long be retained among the institutions of the same people。 Not a single individual of the twelve millions who inhabit the territory of the United States has as yet dared to propose any restrictions to the liberty of the press。 The first newspaper over which I cast my eyes； upon my arrival in America； contained the following article：
In all this affair the language of Jackson has been that of a heartless despot； solely occupied with the preservation of his own authority。 Ambition is his crime； and it will be his punishment too： intrigue is his native element； and intrigue will confound his tricks； and will deprive him of his power： he governs by means of corruption； and his immoral practices will redound to his shame and confusion。 His conduct in the political arena has been that of a shameless and lawless gamester。 He succeeded at the time； but the hour of retribution approaches； and he will be obliged to disgorge his winnings； to throw aside his false dice； and to end his days in some retirement； where he may curse his madness at his leisure； for repentance is a virtue with which his heart is likely to remain forever unacquainted。
It is not uncommonly imagined in France that the virulence of the press originates in the uncertain social condition； in the political excitement； and the general sense of consequent evil which prevail in that country； and it is therefore supposed that as soon as society has resumed a certain degree of composure the press will abandon its present vehemence。 I am inclined to think that the above causes explain the reason of the extraordinary ascendency it has acquired over the nation； but that they do not exercise much influence upon the tone of its language。 The periodical press appears to me to be actuated by passions and propensities independent of the circumstances in which it is placed； and the present position of America corroborates this opinion。
America is perhaps； at this moment； the country of the whole world which contains the fewest germs of revolution； but the press is not less destructive in its principles than in France； and it displays the same violence without the same reasons for indignation。 In America； as in France； it constitutes a singular power； so strangely composed of mingled good and evil that it is at the same time indispensable to the existence of freedom； and nearly incompatible with the maintenance of public order。 Its power is certainly much greater in France than in the United States； though nothing is more rare in the latter country than to hear of a prosecution having been instituted against it。 The reason of this is perfectly simple： the Americans； having once admitted the doctrine of the sovereignty of the people； apply it with perfect consistency。 It was never their intention to found a permanent state of things with elements which undergo daily modifications； and there is consequently nothing criminal in an attack upon the existing laws； provided it be not attended with a violent infraction of them。 They are moreover of opinion that courts of justice are unable to check the abuses of the press； and that as the subtilty of human language perpetually eludes the severity of judicial analysis； offences of this nature are apt to escape the hand which attempts to apprehend them。 They hold that to act with efficacy upon the press it would be necessary to find a tribunal； not only devoted to the existing order of things； but capable of surmounting the influence of public opinion； a tribunal which should conduct its proceedings without publicity； which should pronounce its decrees without assigning its motives； and punish the intentions even more than the language of an author。 Whosoever should have the power of creating and maintaining a tribunal of this kind would waste his time in prosecuting the liberty of the press； for he would be the supreme master of the whole community； and he would be as free to rid himself of the authors as of their writings。 In this question； therefore； there is no medium between servitude and extreme license； in order to enjoy the inestimable benefits which the liberty of the press ensures； it is necessary to submit to the inevitable evils which it engenders。 To expect to acquire the former and to escape the latter is to cherish one of those illusions which commonly mislead nations in their times of sickness； when； tired with faction and exhausted by effort； they attempt to combine hostile opinions and contrary principles upon the same soil。
The small influence of