being paid to the actual struggle which was going on between the nobles and the people； without considering the probable issue of the contest； which was in reality the important point。 When a community really has a mixed government； that is to say； when it is equally divided between two adverse principles； it must either pass through a revolution or fall into complete dissolution。
I am therefore of opinion that some one social power must always be made to predominate over the others； but I think that liberty is endangered when this power is checked by no obstacles which may retard its course； and force it to moderate its own vehemence。
Unlimited power is in itself a bad and dangerous thing； human beings are not competent to exercise it with discretion； and God alone can be omnipotent； because His wisdom and His justice are always equal to His power。 But no power upon earth is so worthy of honor for itself； or of reverential obedience to the rights which it represents； that I would consent to admit its uncontrolled and all…predominant authority。 When I see that the right and the means of absolute command are conferred on a people or upon a king； upon an aristocracy or a democracy； a monarchy or a republic； I recognize the germ of tyranny； and I journey onward to a land of more hopeful institutions。
In my opinion the main evil of the present democratic institutions of the United States does not arise； as is often asserted in Europe； from their weakness； but from their overpowering strength； and I am not so much alarmed at the excessive liberty which reigns in that country as at the very inadequate securities which exist against tyranny。
When an individual or a party is wronged in the United States； to whom can he apply for redress？ If to public opinion； public opinion constitutes the majority； if to the legislature； it represents the majority； and implicitly obeys its injunctions； if to the executive power； it is appointed by the majority； and remains a passive tool in its hands； the public troops consist of the majority under arms； the jury is the majority invested with the right of hearing judicial cases； and in certain States even the judges are elected by the majority。 However iniquitous or absurd the evil of which you complain may be； you must submit to it as well as you can。 *d
＇Footnote d： A striking instance of the excesses which may be occasioned by the despotism of the majority occurred at Baltimore in the year 1812。 At that time the war was very popular in Baltimore。 A journal which had taken the other side of the question excited the indignation of the inhabitants by its opposition。 The populace assembled； broke the printing…presses； and attacked the houses of the newspaper editors。 The militia was called out； but no one obeyed the call； and the only means of saving the poor wretches who were threatened by the frenzy of the mob was to throw them into prison as common malefactors。 But even this precaution was ineffectual； the mob collected again during the night； the magistrates again made a vain attempt to call out the militia； the prison was forced； one of the newspaper editors was killed upon the spot； and the others were left for dead； the guilty parties were acquitted by the jury when they were brought to trial。
I said one day to an inhabitant of Pennsylvania； 〃Be so good as to explain to me how it happens that in a State founded by Quakers； and celebrated for its toleration； freed blacks are not allowed to exercise civil rights。 They pay the taxes； is it not fair that they should have a vote？〃
〃You insult us；〃 replied my informant； 〃if you imagine that our legislators could have committed so gross an act of injustice and intolerance。〃
〃What！ then the blacks possess the right of voting in this county？〃
〃Without the smallest doubt。〃
〃How comes it； then； that at the polling…booth this morning I did not perceive a single negro in the whole meeting？〃
〃This is not the fault of the law： the negroes have an undisputed right of voting； but they voluntarily abstain from making their appearance。〃
〃A very pretty piece of modesty on their parts！〃 rejoined I。
〃Why； the truth is； that they are not disinclined to vote； but they are afraid of being maltreated； in this country the law is sometimes unable to maintain its authority without the support of the majority。 But in this case the majority entertains very strong prejudices against the blacks； and the magistrates are unable to protect them in the exercise of their legal privileges。〃
〃What！ then the majority claims the right not only of making the laws； but of breaking the laws it has made？〃＇
If； on the other hand； a legislative power could be so constituted as to represent the majority without necessarily being the slave of its passions； an executive； so as to retain a certain degree of uncontrolled authority； and a judiciary； so as to remain independent of the two other powers； a government would be formed which would still be democratic without incurring any risk of tyrannical abuse。
I do not say that tyrannical abuses frequently occur in America at the present day； but I maintain that no sure barrier is established against them； and that the causes which mitigate the government are to be found in the circumstances and the manners of the country more than in its laws。
Effects Of The Unlimited Power Of The Majority Upon The Arbitrary Authority Of The American Public Officers
Liberty left by the American laws to public officers within a certain sphere …Their power。
A distinction must be drawn between tyranny and arbitrary power。 Tyranny may be exercised by means of the law； and in that case it is not arbitrary； arbitrary power may be exercised for the good of the community at large； in which case it is not tyrannical。 Tyranny usually employs arbitrary means； but； if necessary； it can rule without them。
In the United States the unbounded power of the majority； which is favorable to the legal despotism of the legislature； is likewise favorable to the arbitrary authority of the magistrate。 The majority has an entire control over the law when it is made and when it is executed； and as it possesses an equal authority over those who are in power and the community at large； it considers public officers as its passive agents； and readily confides the task of serving its designs to their vigilance。 The details of their office and the privileges which they are to enjoy are rarely defined beforehand； but the majority treats them as a master does his servants when they are always at work in his sight； and he has the power of directing or reprimanding them at every instant。
In general the American functionaries are far more independent than the French civil officers within the sphere which is prescribed to them。 Sometimes； even； they are allowed by the popular authority to exceed those bounds； and as they are protected by the opinion； and backed by the co…operation； of the majority； they venture upon such manifestations of their power as astonish a European。 By this means habits are formed in the heart of a free country which may some day prove fatal to its liberties。
Power Exercised By The Majority In America Upon Opinion
In America； when the majority has once irrevocably decided a question； all discussion ceases … Reason of this … Moral power exercised by the majority upon opinion … Democratic republics have deprived despotism of its physical instruments … Their despotism sways the minds of men。
It is in the examination of the display of public opinion in the United States that we clearly perceive how far the power of the majority surpasses all the powers with which we are acquainted in Europe。 Intellectual principles exercise an influence which is so invisible； and often so inappreciable； that they baffle the toils of oppression。 At the present time the most absolute monarchs in Europe are unable to prevent certain notions； which are opposed to their authority； from circulating in secret throughout their dominions； and even in their courts。 Such is not the case in America； as long as the majority is still undecided； discussion is carried on； but as soon as its decision is irrevocably pronounced； a submissive silence is observed； and the friends； as well as the opponents； of the measure unite in assenting to its propriety。 The reason of this is perfectly clear： no monarch is so absolute as to combine all the powers of society in his own hands； and to conquer all opposition with the energy of a majority which is invested with the right of making and of executing the laws。
The authority of a king is purely physical； and it controls the actions of the subject without subduing his private will； but the majority possesses a power which is physical and moral at the same time； it acts upon the will as well as upon the actions of men； and it represses not only all contest； but all controversy。 I know no country in which there is so little true independence of mind and freedom of discussion as in America。 In any constitutional state in Europe every sort of religious and political theory may be advocated and propagated abroad； for there is no country in Europe so subdued by any single authority as not to co