attentively； I speedily discovered that the Americans had made great and successful efforts to counteract these imperfections of human nature； and to correct the natural defects of democracy。 Their divers municipal laws appeared to me to be a means of restraining the ambition of the citizens within a narrow sphere； and of turning those same passions which might have worked havoc in the State； to the good of the township or the parish。 The American legislators have succeeded to a certain extent in opposing the notion of rights to the feelings of envy； the permanence of the religious world to the continual shifting of politics； the experience of the people to its theoretical ignorance； and its practical knowledge of business to the impatience of its desires。
The Americans； then； have not relied upon the nature of their country to counterpoise those dangers which originate in their Constitution and in their political laws。 To evils which are common to all democratic peoples they have applied remedies which none but themselves had ever thought of before； and although they were the first to make the experiment； they have succeeded in it。
The manners and laws of the Americans are not the only ones which may suit a democratic people； but the Americans have shown that it would be wrong to despair of regulating democracy by the aid of manners and of laws。 If other nations should borrow this general and pregnant idea from the Americans； without however intending to imitate them in the peculiar application which they have made of it； if they should attempt to fit themselves for that social condition； which it seems to be the will of Providence to impose upon the generations of this age； and so to escape from the despotism or the anarchy which threatens them； what reason is there to suppose that their efforts would not be crowned with success？ The organization and the establishment of democracy in Christendom is the great political problem of the time。 The Americans； unquestionably； have not resolved this problem； but they furnish useful data to those who undertake the task。
Importance Of What Precedes With Respect To The State Of Europe
It may readily be discovered with what intention I undertook the foregoing inquiries。 The question here discussed is interesting not only to the United States； but to the whole world； it concerns； not a nation； but all mankind。 If those nations whose social condition is democratic could only remain free as long as they are inhabitants of the wilds； we could not but despair of the future destiny of the human race； for democracy is rapidly acquiring a more extended sway； and the wilds are gradually peopled with men。 If it were true that laws and manners are insufficient to maintain democratic institutions； what refuge would remain open to the nations； except the despotism of a single individual？ I am aware that there are many worthy persons at the present time who are not alarmed at this latter alternative； and who are so tired of liberty as to be glad of repose； far from those storms by which it is attended。 But these individuals are ill acquainted with the haven towards which they are bound。 They are so deluded by their recollections； as to judge the tendency of absolute power by what it was formerly； and not by what it might become at the present time。
If absolute power were re…established amongst the democratic nations of Europe； I am persuaded that it would assume a new form； and appear under features unknown to our forefathers。 There was a time in Europe when the laws and the consent of the people had invested princes with almost unlimited authority； but they scarcely ever availed themselves of it。 I do not speak of the prerogatives of the nobility； of the authority of supreme courts of justice； of corporations and their chartered rights； or of provincial privileges； which served to break the blows of the sovereign authority； and to maintain a spirit of resistance in the nation。 Independently of these political institutions … which； however opposed they might be to personal liberty； served to keep alive the love of freedom in the mind of the public； and which may be esteemed to have been useful in this respect … the manners and opinions of the nation confined the royal authority within barriers which were not less powerful； although they were less conspicuous。 Religion； the affections of the people； the benevolence of the prince； the sense of honor； family pride； provincial prejudices； custom； and public opinion limited the power of kings； and restrained their authority within an invisible circle。 The constitution of nations was despotic at that time； but their manners were free。 Princes had the right； but they had neither the means nor the desire； of doing whatever they pleased。
But what now remains of those barriers which formerly arrested the aggressions of tyranny？ Since religion has lost its empire over the souls of men； the most prominent boundary which divided good from evil is overthrown； the very elements of the moral world are indeterminate； the princes and the peoples of the earth are guided by chance； and none can define the natural limits of despotism and the bounds of license。 Long revolutions have forever destroyed the respect which surrounded the rulers of the State； and since they have been relieved from the burden of public esteem； princes may henceforward surrender themselves without fear to the seductions of arbitrary power。
When kings find that the hearts of their subjects are turned towards them； they are clement； because they are conscious of their strength； and they are chary of the affection of their people； because the affection of their people is the bulwark of the throne。 A mutual interchange of good…will then takes place between the prince and the people； which resembles the gracious intercourse of domestic society。 The subjects may murmur at the sovereign's decree； but they are grieved to displease him； and the sovereign chastises his subjects with the light hand of parental affection。
But when once the spell of royalty is broken in the tumult of revolution； when successive monarchs have crossed the throne； so as alternately to display to the people the weakness of their right and the harshness of their power； the sovereign is no longer regarded by any as the Father of the State； and he is feared by all as its master。 If he be weak； he is despised； if he be strong； he is detested。 He himself is full of animosity and alarm； he finds that he is as a stranger in his own country； and he treats his subjects like conquered enemies。
When the provinces and the towns formed so many different nations in the midst of their common country； each of them had a will of its own； which was opposed to the general spirit of subjection； but now that all the parts of the same empire； after having lost their immunities； their customs； their prejudices； their traditions； and their names； are subjected and accustomed to the same laws； it is not more difficult to oppress them collectively than it was formerly to oppress them singly。
Whilst the nobles enjoyed their power； and indeed long after that power was lost； the honor of aristocracy conferred an extraordinary degree of force upon their personal opposition。 They afford instances of men who； notwithstanding their weakness； still entertained a high opinion of their personal value； and dared to cope single…handed with the efforts of the public authority。 But at the present day； when all ranks are more and more confounded； when the individual disappears in the throng； and is easily lost in the midst of a common obscurity； when the honor of monarchy has almost lost its empire without being succeeded by public virtue； and when nothing can enable man to rise above himself； who shall say at what point the exigencies of power and the servility of weakness will stop？
As long as family feeling was kept alive； the antagonist of oppression was never alone； he looked about him； and found his clients； his hereditary friends； and his kinsfolk。 If this support was wanting； he was sustained by his ancestors and animated by his posterity。 But when patrimonial estates are divided； and when a few years suffice to confound the distinctions of a race； where can family feeling be found？ What force can there be in the customs of a country which has changed and is still perpetually changing； its aspect； in which every act of tyranny has a precedent； and every crime an example； in which there is nothing so old that its antiquity can save it from destruction； and nothing so unparalleled that its novelty can prevent it from being done？ What resistance can be offered by manners of so pliant a make that they have already often yielded？ What strength can even public opinion have retained； when no twenty persons are connected by a common tie； when not a man； nor a family； nor chartered corporation； nor class； nor free institution； has the power of representing or exerting that opinion； and when every citizen … being equally weak； equally poor； and equally dependent … has only his personal impotence to oppose to the organized force of the government？
The annals of France furnish nothing analogous to the condition in which