¡¶Ó¢ÓïÄ£Ä⿼³¡10Ìס·

ÏÂÔر¾Êé

Ìí¼ÓÊéÇ©

Ó¢ÓïÄ£Ä⿼³¡10Ì×- µÚ3²¿·Ö


°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡û »ò ¡ú ¿É¿ìËÙÉÏÏ·­Ò³£¬°´¼üÅÌÉ쵀 Enter ¼ü¿É»Øµ½±¾ÊéĿ¼ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡ü ¿É»Øµ½±¾Ò³¶¥²¿£¡
lity£©£»¡¡inspired¡¡a¡¡new¡¡appreciation¡¡of¡¡Botticelli¡¡throughout¡¡the¡¡English¡­speaking¡¡world¡£¡¡Yet¡¡Botticelli¡¯s¡¡work£»¡¡especially¡¡the¡¡Sistine¡¡frescoes£»¡¡did¡¡not¡¡generate¡¡worldwide¡¡attention¡¡until¡¡it¡¡was¡¡finally¡¡subjected¡¡to¡¡a¡¡comprehensive¡¡and¡¡scrupulous¡¡analysis¡¡by¡¡Home¡¡in¡¡1908¡£¡¡Home¡¡rightly¡¡demonstrated¡¡that¡¡the¡¡frescoes¡¡shared¡¡important¡¡features¡¡with¡¡paintings¡¡by¡¡other¡¡fifteenth¡­century¡¡Florentines¡¡¡ª¡¡features¡¡such¡¡as¡¡skillful¡¡representation¡¡of¡¡anatomical¡¡proportions£»¡¡and¡¡of¡¡the¡¡human¡¡figure¡¡in¡¡motion¡£¡¡However£»¡¡Home¡¡argued¡¡that¡¡Botticelli¡¡did¡¡not¡¡treat¡¡these¡¡qualities¡¡as¡¡ends¡¡in¡¡themselves¡¡¡ª¡¡rather£»¡¡that¡¡he¡¡emphasized¡¡clear¡¡depletion¡¡of¡¡a¡¡story£»¡¡a¡¡unique¡¡achievement¡¡and¡¡one¡¡that¡¡made¡¡the¡¡traditional¡¡Florentine¡¡qualities¡¡less¡¡central¡£¡¡Because¡¡of¡¡Home¡¯s¡¡emphasis¡¡crucial¡¡to¡¡any¡¡study¡¡of¡¡art£»¡¡the¡¡twentieth¡¡century¡¡has¡¡come¡¡to¡¡appreciate¡¡Botticelli¡¯s¡¡achievements¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡36¡£Which¡¡of¡¡the¡¡following¡¡would¡¡be¡¡the¡¡best¡¡title¡¡for¡¡the¡¡text£¿¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£§A£§¡¡The¡¡Role¡¡of¡¡Standard¡¡Art¡¡Analyses¡¡and¡¡Appraisals¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£§B£§¡¡Sandro¡¡Botticelli£º¡¡From¡¡Rejection¡¡to¡¡Appreciation¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£§C£§¡¡The¡¡History¡¡of¡¡Critics¡¯¡¡Responses¡¡to¡¡Art¡¡Works¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£§D£§¡¡Botticelli¡¡and¡¡Florentine£º¡¡A¡¡Comparative¡¡Study¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡37¡£We¡¡can¡¡learn¡¡from¡¡the¡¡text¡¡that¡¡art¡¡critics¡¡have¡¡a¡¡history¡¡of¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£§A£§¡¡suppressing¡¡painters¡¯¡¡art¡¡initiatives¡££§B£§¡¡favoring¡¡a¡¡Botticelli¡¯s¡¡best¡¡paintings¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£§C£§¡¡rejecting¡¡traditional¡¡art¡¡characteristics¡££§D£§¡¡undervaluing¡¡Botticelli¡¯s¡¡achievements¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡38¡£The¡¡views¡¡of¡¡Vasari¡¡and¡¡Home¡¡on¡¡Botticelli¡¯s¡¡products¡¡are¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£§A£§¡¡identical¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡£§B£§¡¡complementary¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£§C£§¡¡opposite¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡£§D£§¡¡similar¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡39¡£The¡¡word¡¡¡°connoisseurs¡±¡¡£¨Paragraph¡¡1£©¡¡most¡¡probably¡¡means¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£§A£§¡¡representatives¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Pre¡­Raphaelite¡¡Movement¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£§B£§¡¡people¡¡who¡¡are¡¡in¡¡favor¡¡of¡¡Florentine¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£§C£§¡¡critics¡¡who¡¡are¡¡likely¡¡to¡¡make¡¡assessments¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£§D£§¡¡conservatives¡¡clinging¡¡to¡¡classical¡¡art¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡40¡£What¡¡does¡¡the¡¡author¡¡think¡¡of¡¡Botticelli¡¯s¡¡representation¡¡skills£¿¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£§A£§¡¡They¡¡are¡¡to¡¡be¡¡fully¡¡appreciated¡££§B£§¡¡They¡¡evolve¡¡from¡¡an¡¡uncertain¡¡source¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£§C£§¡¡They¡¡underlie¡¡his¡¡personality¡££§D£§¡¡They¡¡conform¡¡to¡¡the¡¡classical¡¡style¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Part¡¡B¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡±¾²¿·ÖÄÚÈÝÇë²Î¼û¡¡Part¡¡B£¨Ò»£©¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Part¡¡C¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Directions£º¡¡Read¡¡the¡¡following¡¡text¡¡carefully¡¡and¡¡then¡¡translate¡¡the¡¡underlined¡¡segments¡¡into¡¡Chinese¡£¡¡Your¡¡translation¡¡should¡¡be¡¡written¡¡clearly¡¡on¡¡ANSWER¡¡SHEET¡¡2¡£¡¡£¨10¡¡points£©¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡All¡¡U¡£S¡£¡¡nuclear¡¡weapons¡¡production¡¡facilities¡¡are¡¡presently¡¡closed¡¡down£»¡¡and¡¡if¡¡the¡¡various¡¡agreements¡¡are¡¡adhered¡¡to£»¡¡those¡¡facilities¡¡will¡¡never¡¡be¡¡required¡¡except¡¡for¡¡one¡¡critical¡¡capability¡£¡¡All¡¡modern¡¡nuclear¡¡weapons¡¡use¡¡uranium¡¡£¨ÓË£©£»¡¡plutonium£¨îУ©£»¡¡and¡¡tritium£¨ë°£©¡£¡¡Uranium¡¡and¡¡plutonium¡¡have¡¡very¡¡long¡¡half¡­lives£»¡¡and¡¡there¡¡is¡¡large¡¡surplus¡¡of¡¡these¡¡materials¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Tritium£»¡¡however£»¡¡has¡¡a¡¡relatively¡¡short¡¡half¡­life¡¡of¡¡about¡¡12¡£6¡¡years£»¡¡so¡¡about¡¡5¡¡percent¡¡of¡¡the¡¡amount¡¡on¡¡hand¡¡must¡¡be¡¡replaced¡¡each¡¡year¡¡to¡¡maintain¡¡the¡¡current¡¡inventory¡£¡¡£¨46£©¡¡Because¡¡of¡¡the¡¡large¡¡retirement¡¡of¡¡nuclear¡¡weapons¡¡by¡¡the¡¡United¡¡States¡¡in¡¡compliance¡¡with¡¡early¡¡agreements¡¡and¡¡national¡¡policy£»¡¡tritium¡¡from¡¡retired¡¡weapons¡¡has¡¡been¡¡used¡¡to¡¡make¡¡up¡¡that¡¡lost¡¡through¡¡natural¡¡decay¡£¡¡£¨47£©¡¡However£»¡¡in¡¡about¡¡10¡¡to¡¡15¡¡years£»¡¡depending¡¡on¡¡future¡¡negotiations£»¡¡the¡¡United¡¡States¡¡will¡¡need¡¡a¡¡guaranteed¡¡supply¡¡of¡¡tritium¡¡to¡¡maintain¡¡its¡¡stockpile¡¡at¡¡whatever¡¡level¡¡is¡¡agreed¡¡on¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡In¡¡anticipation¡¡of¡¡this¡¡future¡¡need¡¡to¡¡produce¡¡tritium£»¡¡Defense¡¡Office¡¡Executive¡¡is¡¡pursuing¡¡two¡¡technologies¡£¡¡One¡¡uses¡¡a¡¡nuclear¡¡reactor¡¡that¡¡could¡¡also¡¡produce¡¡electricity¡¡whose¡¡sale¡¡would¡¡recover¡¡not¡¡only¡¡the¡¡capital¡¡cost¡¡of¡¡the¡¡reactor¡¡but¡¡also¡¡its¡¡annual¡¡operational¡¡cost¡£¡¡£¨48£©¡¡Unfortunately£»¡¡the¡¡present¡¡Administration¡¡has¡¡a¡¡definite¡¡bias¡¡against¡¡nuclear¡¡power£»¡¡so¡¡an¡¡alternative¡¡method¡¡is¡¡also¡¡being¡¡pursued¡¡even¡¡though¡¡it¡¡is¡¡agreed¡¡that¡¡it¡¡will¡¡cost¡¡twice¡¡as¡¡much¡¡as¡¡a¡¡reactor¡¡and¡¡use¡¡as¡¡much¡¡electricity¡¡as¡¡a¡¡reactor¡¡would¡¡produce¡£¡¡This¡¡technology¡¡uses¡¡an¡¡accelerator¡¡to¡¡produce¡¡high¡­energy¡¡protons¡¡that¡¡in¡¡turn¡¡produce¡¡neutrons¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡The¡¡main¡¡argument¡¡for¡¡the¡¡accelerator¡¡is¡¡that¡¡it¡¡produces¡¡no¡¡conventional¡¡nuclear¡¡wastes¡£¡¡£¨49£©¡¡Proponents¡¡readily¡¡admit¡¡that¡¡it¡¡will¡¡produce¡¡radioactive¡¡materials£»¡¡but¡¡with¡¡a¡¡relatively¡¡short¡¡halfª²life¡¡compared¡¡with¡¡that¡¡of¡¡wastes¡¡from¡¡spent¡¡nuclear¡¡fuel¡£¡¡The¡¡fact¡¡that¡¡the¡¡accelerator¡¡will¡¡require¡¡the¡¡equivalent¡¡of¡¡a¡¡nuclear¡¡power¡¡plant¡¡to¡¡supply¡¡its¡¡electricity¡¡is¡¡ignored¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£¨50£©¡¡Proponents¡¡also¡¡neglect¡¡to¡¡mention¡¡that¡¡about¡¡22¡¡percent¡¡of¡¡all¡¡electrical¡¡energy¡¡generated¡¡in¡¡the¡¡United¡¡States¡¡comes¡¡from¡¡nuclear¡¡power¡¡plants£»¡¡so¡¡that¡¡22¡¡percent¡¡of¡¡the¡¡power¡¡used¡¡by¡¡the¡¡accelerator¡¡will¡¡generate¡¡conventional¡¡nuclear¡¡wastes£»¡¡in¡¡addition¡¡to¡¡those¡¡the¡¡accelerator¡¡produces¡£¡¡There¡¡is¡¡an¡¡alternative¡¡to¡¡either¡¡the¡¡reactor¡¡or¡¡the¡¡accelerator£»¡¡which¡¡is¡¡simply¡¡to¡¡buy¡¡the¡¡required¡¡tritium¡¡from¡¡Canada¡¡or¡¡Russia¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Section¡¡¢ó¡¡¡¡¡¡Writing¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Part¡¡¡¡A¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡51¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Direction£ºYou¡¡have¡¡bought¡¡a¡¡brand¡­new¡¡computer¡¡in¡¡a¡¡store¡£¡¡But¡¡much¡¡to¡¡your¡¡disappointment£»¡¡it¡¡could¡¡not¡¡be¡¡properly¡¡operated¡¡when¡¡you¡¡got¡¡it¡¡back¡£¡¡Write¡¡a¡¡letter¡¡to¡¡the¡¡manager£»¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡1£©¡¡giving¡¡complaints£»¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡2£©¡¡describing¡¡the¡¡problems£»¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡3£©¡¡and¡¡asking¡¡for¡¡some¡¡compensations¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Part¡¡¡¡B¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡52¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Direction£º¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡A¡¡cry¡¡for¡¡Nature¡¡Conservation¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡A¡£¡¡Study¡¡the¡¡following¡¡cartoon¡¡carefully¡¡and¡¡write¡¡an¡¡essay¡¡in¡¡no¡¡less¡¡than¡¡200¡¡words¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡B¡£¡¡Your¡¡essay¡¡must¡¡be¡¡written¡¡clearly¡¡on¡¡ANSWER¡¡SHEET¡¡2¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡C¡£¡¡Your¡¡essay¡¡should¡¡meet¡¡the¡¡requirements¡¡below£º¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡1£©¡¡describe¡¡the¡¡cartoon¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡2£©¡¡interpret¡¡the¡¡message¡¡conveyed¡¡in¡¡the¡¡picture¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡3£©¡¡and¡¡give¡¡your¡¡suggestions¡¡to¡¡remedy¡¡the¡¡situation¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Part¡¡B¡¡¡¡£¨Ò»£©¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Sample¡¡One¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Directions£ºIn¡¡the¡¡following¡¡text£»¡¡some¡¡sentences¡¡have¡¡been¡¡removed¡£¡¡For¡¡questions¡¡41¡­45£»¡¡choose¡¡the¡¡most¡¡suitable¡¡one¡¡from¡¡the¡¡list¡¡A¡­G¡¡to¡¡fit¡¡into¡¡each¡¡of¡¡the¡¡numbered¡¡blank¡£¡¡There¡¡are¡¡two¡¡extra¡¡choices£»¡¡which¡¡do¡¡not¡¡fit¡¡in¡¡any¡¡of¡¡the¡¡gaps¡£¡¡Mark¡¡your¡¡answers¡¡on¡¡ANSWER¡¡SHEET¡¡1¡£¡¡£¨10¡¡points£©¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Many¡¡of¡¡the¡¡philosophers¡¡we¡¡have¡¡been¡¡reading¡¡in¡¡class¡¡seem¡¡to¡¡me¡¡to¡¡be¡¡hopelessly¡¡dated¡£¡¡Of¡¡course£»¡¡it¡¯s¡¡easy¡¡to¡¡become¡¡trapped¡¡in¡¡writing¡¡only¡¡for¡¡the¡¡period¡¡a¡¡person¡¡lives¡¡in£»¡¡and¡¡a¡¡philosophy¡¡is¡¡necessarily¡¡dependent¡¡on¡¡the¡¡historical¡¡situation¡¡and¡¡the¡¡extent¡¡of¡¡man¡¯s¡¡knowledge¡£¡¡£¨41£©¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡However£»¡¡Victor¡¡Hugo¡¡said¡¡that¡¡if¡¡he¡¡were¡¡writing¡¡for¡¡his¡¡own¡¡time¡¡only£»¡¡he¡¡would¡¡have¡¡to¡¡break¡¡his¡¡pen¡¡and¡¡throw¡¡it¡¡away¡£¡¡£¨42£©¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£¡¡And¡¡it¡¡seems¡¡to¡¡me¡¡that¡¡the¡¡most¡¡frequent¡¡objections¡¡to¡¡modern¡¡and¡¡preª²modern¡¡philosophers¡¡come¡¡from¡¡the¡¡incompatibility¡¡of¡¡their¡¡philosophies¡¡with¡¡what¡¡is¡¡considered¡¡to¡¡be¡¡established¡¡scientific¡¡fact¡£¡¡For¡¡instance£»¡¡Plato¡¯s¡¡theory¡¡of¡¡forms¡¡does¡¡not£»¡¡to¡¡me£»¡¡seem¡¡to¡¡jibe¡¡with¡¡modern¡¡physics¡¡and¡¡cosmology¡£¡¡And¡¡although¡¡I¡¡can¡¡only¡¡vaguely¡¡glimpse¡¡the¡¡psychology¡¡which¡¡underlies¡¡Kant£»¡¡it¡¡seems¡¡to¡¡be¡¡highly¡¡questionable¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£¨43£©¡¡¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£¨44£©¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£¡¡History¡¡is£»¡¡of¡¡course£»¡¡necessary¡¡to¡¡any¡¡understanding¡¡of¡¡a¡¡philosophy£º¡¡how¡¡it¡¡came¡¡about£»¡¡what¡¡people¡¡did¡¡with¡¡it£»¡¡etc¡£¡¡Sartre£»¡¡although¡¡he¡¡developed¡¡some¡¡of¡¡his¡¡ideas¡¡from¡¡Nietzsche¡¡and¡¡Kierkegaard£»¡¡probably¡¡could¡¡not¡¡have¡¡expounded¡¡those¡¡same¡¡ideas¡¡of¡¡existentialism¡¡in¡¡their¡¡times£»¡¡Nietzsche£»¡¡who¡¡popularized¡¡the¡¡idea¡¡that¡¡¡°God¡¡is¡¡dead¡±£»¡¡could¡¡not¡¡have¡¡written¡¡in¡¡the¡¡time¡¡of¡¡Descartes£»¡¡and¡¡Descartes¡¡could¡¡not¡¡have¡¡expressed¡¡his¡¡radically¡¡individualist¡¡ideas¡¡during¡¡the¡¡time¡¡of¡¡Plato¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡I¡¡suppose¡¡that¡¡my¡¡point£»¡¡which¡¡I¡¡am¡¡being¡¡exceedingly¡¡longª²winded¡¡about£»¡¡is¡¡that¡¡philosophy¡¡does¡¡not¡¡£¨and¡¡should¡¡not£»¡¡and¡¡must¡¡not£©¡¡stand¡¡apart¡¡from¡¡the¡¡rest¡¡of¡¡the¡¡sciences¡£¡¡£¨45£©¡¡¡£¡¡Although¡¡the¡¡other¡¡sciences¡¡can¡¡provide¡¡us¡¡with¡¡data£»¡¡observations£»¡¡and¡¡theories£»¡¡only¡¡philosophy¡¡can¡¡integrate¡¡those¡¡into¡¡a¡¡coherent¡¡whole£»¡¡tell¡¡us¡¡what¡¡to¡¡do¡¡with¡¡them£»¡¡or¡¡provide¡¡a¡¡meaningful¡¡context¡¡for¡¡using¡¡these¡¡facts¡¡in¡¡our¡¡daily¡¡lives¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£§A£§¡¡In¡¡my¡¡view£»¡¡application¡¡of¡¡Kant¡¯s¡¡epistemology¡¡and¡¡metaphysics¡¡could¡¡never¡¡produce¡¡an¡¡artificial¡¡intelligence¡¡capable¡¡of¡¡passing¡¡a¡¡Turing¡¡test¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£§B£§¡¡Rather£»¡¡philosophy¡¡should¡¡be¡¡integrated¡¡with¡¡the¡¡rest¡¡of¡¡the¡¡sciences¡¡through¡¡a¡¡method¡¡of¡¡rational¡¡judgment¡£¡¡Rather¡¡than¡¡sailing¡¡behind£»¡¡or¡¡next¡¡to¡¡but¡¡away¡¡from£»¡¡the¡¡rest¡¡of¡¡the¡¡sciences£»¡¡Philosophy¡¡should¡¡be¡¡the¡¡flagship¡¡of¡¡the¡¡group¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£§C£§¡¡And¡¡many¡¡of¡¡the¡¡philosophers¡¡who¡¡have¡¡existed¡¡over¡¡the¡¡course¡¡of¡¡the¡¡centuries¡¡have¡¡necessarily¡¡had¡¡to¡¡worry¡¡about¡¡governmental£»¡¡church£»¡¡or¡¡societal¡¡disapproval£»¡¡censorship£»¡¡or¡¡punishment¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£§D£§¡¡After¡¡all£»¡¡physics¡¡can¡¡give¡¡us¡¡insights¡¡into¡¡metaphysics£»¡¡since¡¡both¡¡seek¡¡different¡¡ways¡¡to¡¡do¡¡the¡¡same¡¡thing£»¡¡psychology£»¡¡sociology£»¡¡anthropology£»¡¡and¡¡archeology¡¡can¡¡give¡¡us¡¡insights¡¡into¡¡epistemology£»¡¡various¡¡¡°soft¡±¡¡sciences¡¡dealing¡¡with¡¡comparative¡¡cultures¡¡can¡¡provide¡¡food¡¡for¡¡thought¡¡in¡¡ethnics£»¡¡and¡¡so¡¡on¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£§E£§¡¡Although¡¡some¡¡philosophical¡¡people¡¡are¡¡not¡¡necessarily¡¡considered¡¡as¡¡philosophers¡¡today£¬whose¡¡work¡¡was¡¡influential¡¡and¡¡instrumental¡¡in¡¡developing¡¡one¡¡of¡¡the¡¡social¡¡sciences¡¡£¨¡¡psychology£»¡¡sociology£»¡¡political¡¡science£»¡¡education£©¡¡or¡¡in¡¡advancing¡¡theoretical¡¡science¡¡£¨what¡¡is¡¡now¡¡called¡¡philosophy¡¡of¡¡science£©¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£§F£§¡¡And¡¡so£»¡¡it¡¡seems¡¡to¡¡me£»¡¡the¡¡best¡¡way¡¡that¡¡a¡¡philosopher¡¡can¡¡keep¡¡from¡¡being¡¡dated¡¡is¡¡to¡¡be¡¡aware¡¡of¡¡scientific¡¡knowledge£»¡¡and¡¡integrate¡¡it¡¡into¡¡philosophy¡£¡¡Of¡¡cours
СÌáʾ£º°´ »Ø³µ [Enter] ¼ü ·µ»ØÊéÄ¿£¬°´ ¡û ¼ü ·µ»ØÉÏÒ»Ò³£¬ °´ ¡ú ¼ü ½øÈëÏÂÒ»Ò³¡£ ÔÞһϠÌí¼ÓÊéÇ©¼ÓÈëÊé¼Ü