like to do； and no creature can ever reach this stage of moral disposition。 For； being a creature； and therefore always dependent with respect to what be requires for complete satisfaction； he can never be quite free from desires and inclinations； and as these rest on physical causes； they can never of themselves coincide with the moral law； the sources of which are quite different； and therefore they make it necessary to found the mental disposition of one's maxims on moral obligation； not on ready inclination； but on respect； which demands obedience to the law； even though one may not like it； not on love； which apprehends no inward reluctance of the will towards the law。 Nevertheless； this latter； namely； love to the law （which would then cease to be a command； and then morality； which would have passed subjectively into holiness； would cease to be virtue） must be the constant though unattainable goal of his endeavours。 For in the case of what we highly esteem； but yet （on account of the consciousness of our weakness） dread； the increased facility of satisfying it changes the most reverential awe into inclination； and respect into love； at least this would be the perfection of a disposition devoted to the law； if it were possible for a creature to attain it。
*This law is in striking contrast with the principle of private happiness which some make the supreme principle of morality。 This would be expressed thus： Love thyself above everything； and God and thy neighbour for thine own sake。
This reflection is intended not so much to clear up the evangelical command just cited； in order to prevent religious fanaticism in regard to love of God； but to define accurately the moral disposition with regard directly to our duties towards men； and to check； or if possible prevent； a merely moral fanaticism which infects many persons。 The stage of morality on which man （and； as far as we can see； every rational creature） stands is respect for the moral law。 The disposition that he ought to have in obeying this is to obey it from duty； not from spontaneous inclination； or from an endeavour taken up from liking and unbidden； and this proper moral condition in which he can always be is virtue； that is； moral disposition militant； and not holiness in the fancied possession of a perfect purity of the disposition of the will。 It is nothing but moral fanaticism and exaggerated self…conceit that is infused into the mind by exhortation to actions as noble； sublime； and magnanimous； by which men are led into the delusion that it is not duty； that is； respect for the law； whose yoke （an easy yoke indeed； because reason itself imposes it on us） they must bear； whether they like it or not； that constitutes the determining principle of their actions； and which always humbles them while they obey it； fancying that those actions are expected from them； not from duty； but as pure merit。 For not only would they； in imitating such deeds from such a principle； not have fulfilled the spirit of the law in the least； which consists not in the legality of the action （without regard to principle）； but in the subjection of the mind to the law； not only do they make the motives pathological （seated in sympathy or self…love）； not moral （in the law）； but they produce in this way a vain； high…flying； fantastic way of thinking； flattering themselves with a spontaneous goodness of heart that needs neither spur nor bridle； for which no command is needed； and thereby forgetting their obligation； which they ought to think of rather than merit。 Indeed actions of others which are done with great sacrifice； and merely for the sake of duty； may be praised as noble and sublime； but only so far as there are traces which suggest that they were done wholly out of respect for duty and not from excited feelings。 If these； however； are set before anyone as examples to be imitated； respect for duty （which is the only true moral feeling） must be employed as the motive… this severe holy precept which never allows our vain self…love to dally with pathological impulses （however analogous they may be to morality）； and to take a pride in meritorious worth。 Now if we search we shall find for all actions that are worthy of praise a law of duty which commands； and does not leave us to choose what may be agreeable to our inclinations。 This is the only way of representing things that can give a moral training to the soul； because it alone is capable of solid and accurately defined principles。 If fanaticism in its most general sense is a deliberate over stepping of the limits of human reason； then moral fanaticism is such an over stepping of the bounds that practical pure reason sets to mankind； in that it forbids us to place the subjective determining principle of correct actions； that is； their moral motive； in anything but the law itself； or to place the disposition which is thereby brought into the maxims in anything but respect for this law； and hence commands us to take as the supreme vital principle of all morality in men the thought of duty； which strikes down all arrogance as well as vain self…love。 If this is so； it is not only writers of romance or sentimental educators （although they may be zealous opponents of sentimentalism）； but sometimes even philosophers； nay； even the severest of all； the Stoics； that have brought in moral fanaticism instead of a sober but wise moral discipline； although the fanaticism of the latter was more heroic； that of the former of an insipid； effeminate character； and we may； without hypocrisy； say of the moral teaching of the Gospel； that it first； by the purity of its moral principle； and at the same time by its suitability to the limitations of finite beings； brought all the good conduct of men under the discipline of a duty plainly set before their eyes； which does not permit them to indulge in dreams of imaginary moral perfections； and that it also set the bounds of humility （that is； self…knowledge） to self…conceit as well as to self…love； both which are ready to mistake their limits。 Duty！ Thou sublime and mighty name that dost embrace nothing charming or insinuating； but requirest submission； and yet seekest not to move the will by threatening aught that would arouse natural aversion or terror； but merely holdest forth a law which of itself finds entrance into the mind； and yet gains reluctant reverence （though not always obedience）； a law before which all inclinations are dumb； even though they secretly counter…work it； what origin is there worthy of thee； and where is to be found the root of thy noble descent which proudly rejects all kindred with the inclinations； a root to be derived from which is the indispensable condition of the only worth which men can give themselves？ It can be nothing less than a power which elevates man above himself （as a part of the world of sense）； a power which connects him with an order of things that only the understanding can conceive； with a world which at the same time commands the whole sensible world； and with it the empirically determinable existence of man in time； as well as the sum total of all ends （which totality alone suits such unconditional practical laws as the moral）。 This power is nothing but personality； that is； freedom and independence on the mechanism of nature； yet； regarded also as a faculty of a being which is subject to special laws； namely； pure practical laws given by its own reason； so that the person as belonging to the sensible world is subject to his own personality as belonging to the intelligible ＇supersensible＇ world。 It is then not to be wondered at that man； as belonging to both worlds； must regard his own nature in reference to its second and highest characteristic only with reverence； and its laws with the highest respect。 On this origin are founded many expressions which designate the worth of objects according to moral ideas。 The moral law is holy （inviolable）。 Man is indeed unholy enough； but he must regard humanity in his own person as holy。 In all creation every thing one chooses and over which one has any power； may be used merely as means； man alone； and with him every rational creature； is an end in himself。 By virtue of the autonomy of his freedom he is the subject of the moral law； which is holy。 just for this reason every will； even every person's own individual will； in relation to itself； is restricted to the condition of agreement with the autonomy of the rational being； that is to say； that it is not to be subject to any purpose which cannot accord with a law which might arise from the will of the passive subject himself； the latter is； therefore； never to be employed merely as means； but as itself also； concurrently； an end。 We justly attribute this condition even to the Divine will； with regard to the rational beings in the world； which are His creatures； since it rests on their personality； by which alone they are ends in themselves。 This respect…inspiring idea of personality which sets before our eyes the sublimity of our nature （in its higher aspect）； while at the same time it shows us the want of accord of our conduct with it and thereby strikes down self…conceit； is even natural to the commonest reason and easily observed。 Has not every even m