the whole coast of North America thus became a British possession towards the end of the sixteenth century。 The means used by the English Government to people these new domains were of several kinds； the King sometimes appointed a governor of his own choice； who ruled a portion of the New World in the name and under the immediate orders of the Crown； *j this is the colonial system adopted by other countries of Europe。 Sometimes grants of certain tracts were made by the Crown to an individual or to a company； *k in which case all the civil and political power fell into the hands of one or more persons； who； under the inspection and control of the Crown； sold the lands and governed the inhabitants。 Lastly； a third system consisted in allowing a certain number of emigrants to constitute a political society under the protection of the mother…country； and to govern themselves in whatever was not contrary to her laws。 This mode of colonization； so remarkably favorable to liberty； was only adopted in New England。 *l
＇Footnote j： This was the case in the State of New York。＇
＇Footnote k： Maryland； the Carolinas； Pennsylvania； and New Jersey were in this situation。 See 〃Pitkin's History；〃 vol。 i。 pp。 11…31。＇
＇Footnote l： See the work entitled 〃Historical Collection of State Papers and other authentic Documents intended as materials for a History of the United States of America； by Ebenezer Hasard。 Philadelphia； 1792；〃 for a great number of documents relating to the commencement of the colonies； which are valuable from their contents and their authenticity： amongst them are the various charters granted by the King of England； and the first acts of the local governments。
See also the analysis of all these charters given by Mr。 Story； Judge of the Supreme Court of the United States； in the Introduction to his 〃Commentary on the Constitution of the United States。〃 It results from these documents that the principles of representative government and the external forms of political liberty were introduced into all the colonies at their origin。 These principles were more fully acted upon in the North than in the South； but they existed everywhere。＇
In 1628 *m a charter of this kind was granted by Charles I to the emigrants who went to form the colony of Massachusetts。 But； in general； charters were not given to the colonies of New England till they had acquired a certain existence。 Plymouth； Providence； New Haven； the State of Connecticut； and that of Rhode Island *n were founded without the co…operation and almost without the knowledge of the mother…country。 The new settlers did not derive their incorporation from the seat of the empire； although they did not deny its supremacy； they constituted a society of their own accord； and it was not till thirty or forty years afterwards； under Charles II。 that their existence was legally recognized by a royal charter。
＇Footnote m： See 〃Pitkin's History；〃 p； 35。 See the 〃History of the Colony of Massachusetts Bay；〃 by Hutchinson； vol。 i。 p。 9。＇ ＇Footnote n： See 〃Pitkin's History；〃 pp。 42； 47。＇
This frequently renders its it difficult to detect the link which connected the emigrants with the land of their forefathers in studying the earliest historical and legislative records of New England。 They exercised the rights of sovereignty； they named their magistrates； concluded peace or declared war； made police regulations； and enacted laws as if their allegiance was due only to God。 *o Nothing can be more curious and； at the same time more instructive； than the legislation of that period； it is there that the solution of the great social problem which the United States now present to the world is to be found。
＇Footnote o： The inhabitants of Massachusetts had deviated from the forms which are preserved in the criminal and civil procedure of England； in 1650 the decrees of justice were not yet headed by the royal style。 See Hutchinson； vol。 i。 p。 452。＇
Amongst these documents we shall notice； as especially characteristic； the code of laws promulgated by the little State of Connecticut in 1650。 *p The legislators of Connecticut *q begin with the penal laws； and； strange to say； they borrow their provisions from the text of Holy Writ。 〃Whosoever shall worship any other God than the Lord；〃 says the preamble of the Code； 〃shall surely be put to death。〃 This is followed by ten or twelve enactments of the same kind； copied verbatim from the books of Exodus； Leviticus； and Deuteronomy。 Blasphemy； sorcery； adultery； *r and rape were punished with death； an outrage offered by a son to his parents was to be expiated by the same penalty。 The legislation of a rude and half…civilized people was thus applied to an enlightened and moral community。 The consequence was that the punishment of death was never more frequently prescribed by the statute； and never more rarely enforced towards the guilty。
＇Footnote p： Code of 1650； p。 28； Hartford； 1830。＇
＇Footnote q： See also in 〃Hutchinson's History；〃 vol。 i。 pp。 435； 456； the analysis of the penal code adopted in 1648 by the Colony of Massachusetts： this code is drawn up on the same principles as that of Connecticut。＇
＇Footnote r： Adultery was also punished with death by the law of Massachusetts： and Hutchinson； vol。 i。 p。 441； says that several persons actually suffered for this crime。 He quotes a curious anecdote on this subject； which occurred in the year 1663。 A married woman had had criminal intercourse with a young man； her husband died； and she married the lover。 Several years had elapsed； when the public began to suspect the previous intercourse of this couple： they were thrown into prison； put upon trial； and very narrowly escaped capital punishment。＇
The chief care of the legislators； in this body of penal laws； was the maintenance of orderly conduct and good morals in the community： they constantly invaded the domain of conscience； and there was scarcely a sin which was not subject to magisterial censure。 The reader is aware of the rigor with which these laws punished rape and adultery； intercourse between unmarried persons was likewise severely repressed。 The judge was empowered to inflict a pecuniary penalty； a whipping； or marriage *s on the misdemeanants； and if the records of the old courts of New Haven may be believed； prosecutions of this kind were not unfrequent。 We find a sentence bearing date the first of May； 1660； inflicting a fine and reprimand on a young woman who was accused of using improper language； and of allowing herself to be kissed。 *t The Code of 1650 abounds in preventive measures。 It punishes idleness and drunkenness with severity。 *u Innkeepers are forbidden to furnish more than a certain quantity of liquor to each consumer； and simple lying； whenever it may be injurious； *v is checked by a fine or a flogging。 In other places； the legislator； entirely forgetting the great principles of religious toleration which he had himself upheld in Europe； renders attendance on divine service compulsory； *w and goes so far as to visit with severe punishment； ** and even with death； the Christians who chose to worship God according to a ritual differing from his own。 *x Sometimes indeed the zeal of his enactments induces him to descend to the most frivolous particulars： thus a law is to be found in the same Code which prohibits the use of tobacco。 *y It must not be forgotten that these fantastical and vexatious laws were not imposed by authority； but that they were freely voted by all the persons interested； and that the manners of the community were even more austere and more puritanical than the laws。 In 1649 a solemn association was formed in Boston to check the worldly luxury of long hair。 *z
＇Footnote s： Code of 1650； p。 48。 It seems sometimes to have happened that the judges superadded these punishments to each other； as is seen in a sentence pronounced in 1643 （p。 114； 〃New Haven Antiquities〃）； by which Margaret Bedford； convicted of loose conduct； was condemned to be whipped； and afterwards to marry Nicholas Jemmings； her accomplice。＇
＇Footnote t： 〃New Haven Antiquities；〃 p。 104。 See also 〃Hutchinson's History；〃 for several causes equally extraordinary。＇
＇Footnote u： Code of 1650； pp。 50； 57。＇
＇Footnote v： Ibid。； p。 64。＇
＇Footnote w： Ibid。； p。 44。＇
＇Footnote *： This was not peculiar to Connecticut。 See； for instance； the law which； on September 13； 1644； banished the Anabaptists from the State of Massachusetts。 （〃Historical Collection of State Papers；〃 vol。 i。 p。 538。） See also the law against the Quakers； passed on October 14； 1656： 〃Whereas；〃 says the preamble； 〃an accursed race of heretics called Quakers has sprung up；〃 etc。 The clauses of the statute inflict a heavy fine on all captains of ships who should import Quakers into the country。 The Quakers who may be found there shall be whipped and imprisoned with hard labor。 Those members of the sect who should defend their opinions shall be first fined； then imprisoned； and finally driven out of the province。 … 〃Historical Collection of State Papers；〃 vol。 i。 p。 630。＇
＇Footnote x： By the penal law of Massachusetts； any Catholic priest who should set foot in the colony after having been once driven out of it was liabl