th； one man； aided by slaves； could cultivate a great extent of country： it was therefore common to see rich landed proprietors。 But their influence was not altogether aristocratic as that term is understood in Europe； since they possessed no privileges； and the cultivation of their estates being carried on by slaves； they had no tenants depending on them； and consequently no patronage。 Still； the great proprietors south of the Hudson constituted a superior class； having ideas and tastes of its own； and forming the centre of political action。 This kind of aristocracy sympathized with the body of the people； whose passions and interests it easily embraced； but it was too weak and too short…lived to excite either love or hatred for itself。 This was the class which headed the insurrection in the South； and furnished the best leaders of the American revolution。
At the period of which we are now speaking society was shaken to its centre： the people； in whose name the struggle had taken place； conceived the desire of exercising the authority which it had acquired； its democratic tendencies were awakened； and having thrown off the yoke of the mother…country； it aspired to independence of every kind。 The influence of individuals gradually ceased to be felt； and custom and law united together to produce the same result。
But the law of descent was the last step to equality。 I am surprised that ancient and modern jurists have not attributed to this law a greater influence on human affairs。 *a It is true that these laws belong to civil affairs； but they ought nevertheless to be placed at the head of all political institutions； for； whilst political laws are only the symbol of a nation's condition； they exercise an incredible influence upon its social state。 They have； moreover； a sure and uniform manner of operating upon society； affecting； as it were； generations yet unborn。
＇Footnote a： I understand by the law of descent all those laws whose principal object is to regulate the distribution of property after the death of its owner。 The law of entail is of this number； it certainly prevents the owner from disposing of his possessions before his death； but this is solely with the view of preserving them entire for the heir。 The principal object； therefore； of the law of entail is to regulate the descent of property after the death of its owner： its other provisions are merely means to this end。＇
Through their means man acquires a kind of preternatural power over the future lot of his fellow…creatures。 When the legislator has regulated the law of inheritance； he may rest from his labor。 The machine once put in motion will go on for ages； and advance； as if self…guided； towards a given point。 When framed in a particular manner； this law unites； draws together； and vests property and power in a few hands： its tendency is clearly aristocratic。 On opposite principles its action is still more rapid； it divides； distributes； and disperses both property and power。 Alarmed by the rapidity of its progress； those who despair of arresting its motion endeavor to obstruct it by difficulties and impediments； they vainly seek to counteract its effect by contrary efforts； but it gradually reduces or destroys every obstacle； until by its incessant activity the bulwarks of the influence of wealth are ground down to the fine and shifting sand which is the basis of democracy。 When the law of inheritance permits； still more when it decrees； the equal division of a father's property amongst all his children； its effects are of two kinds： it is important to distinguish them from each other； although they tend to the same end。
In virtue of the law of partible inheritance； the death of every proprietor brings about a kind of revolution in property； not only do his possessions change hands； but their very nature is altered； since they are parcelled into shares； which become smaller and smaller at each division。 This is the direct and； as it were； the physical effect of the law。 It follows； then； that in countries where equality of inheritance is established by law； property； and especially landed property； must have a tendency to perpetual diminution。 The effects； however； of such legislation would only be perceptible after a lapse of time； if the law was abandoned to its own working； for supposing the family to consist of two children （and in a country people as France is the average number is not above three）； these children； sharing amongst them the fortune of both parents； would not be poorer than their father or mother。
But the law of equal division exercises its influence not merely upon the property itself； but it affects the minds of the heirs； and brings their passions into play。 These indirect consequences tend powerfully to the destruction of large fortunes； and especially of large domains。 Among nations whose law of descent is founded upon the right of primogeniture landed estates often pass from generation to generation without undergoing division； the consequence of which is that family feeling is to a certain degree incorporated with the estate。 The family represents the estate； the estate the family； whose name； together with its origin； its glory； its power； and its virtues； is thus perpetuated in an imperishable memorial of the past and a sure pledge of the future。
When the equal partition of property is established by law； the intimate connection is destroyed between family feeling and the preservation of the paternal estate； the property ceases to represent the family； for as it must inevitably be divided after one or two generations； it has evidently a constant tendency to diminish； and must in the end be completely dispersed。 The sons of the great landed proprietor； if they are few in number； or if fortune befriends them； may indeed entertain the hope of being as wealthy as their father； but not that of possessing the same property as he did； the riches must necessarily be composed of elements different from his。
Now； from the moment that you divest the landowner of that interest in the preservation of his estate which he derives from association； from tradition； and from family pride； you may be certain that sooner or later he will dispose of it； for there is a strong pecuniary interest in favor of selling； as floating capital produces higher interest than real property； and is more readily available to gratify the passions of the moment。
Great landed estates which have once been divided never come together again； for the small proprietor draws from his land a better revenue； in proportion； than the large owner does from his； and of course he sells it at a higher rate。 *b The calculations of gain； therefore； which decide the rich man to sell his domain will still more powerfully influence him against buying small estates to unite them into a large one。
＇Footnote b： I do not mean to say that the small proprietor cultivates his land better； but he cultivates it with more ardor and care； so that he makes up by his labor for his want of skill。＇
What is called family pride is often founded upon an illusion of self…love。 A man wishes to perpetuate and immortalize himself； as it were； in his great…grandchildren。 Where the esprit de famille ceases to act individual selfishness comes into play。 When the idea of family becomes vague； indeterminate； and uncertain； a man thinks of his present convenience； he provides for the establishment of his succeeding generation； and no more。 Either a man gives up the idea of perpetuating his family； or at any rate he seeks to accomplish it by other means than that of a landed estate。 Thus not only does the law of partible inheritance render it difficult for families to preserve their ancestral domains entire； but it deprives them of the inclination to attempt it； and compels them in some measure to co…operate with the law in their own extinction。
The law of equal distribution proceeds by two methods： by acting upon things； it acts upon persons； by influencing persons； it affects things。 By these means the law succeeds in striking at the root of landed property； and dispersing rapidly both families and fortunes。 *c
＇Footnote c： Land being the most stable kind of property； we find； from time to time； rich individuals who are disposed to make great sacrifices in order to obtain it； and who willingly forfeit a considerable part of their income to make sure of the rest。 But these are accidental cases。 The preference for landed property is no longer found habitually in any class but among the poor。 The small landowner； who has less information； less imagination； and fewer passions than the great one； is generally occupied with the desire of increasing his estate： and it often happens that by inheritance； by marriage； or by the chances of trade； he is gradually furnished with the means。 Thus； to balance the tendency which leads men to divide their estates； there exists another； which incites them to add to them。 This tendency； which is sufficient to prevent estates from being divided ad infinitum； is not strong enough to create great territorial possessions； certainly not to keep them up in the same family。＇
Most certainly it is not for us Frenchmen of the nineteent