ise of his authority he cannot be said to be perfectly independent； the Senate takes cognizance of his relations with foreign powers； and of the distribution of public appointments； so that he can neither be bribed nor can he employ the means of corruption。 The legislators of the Union acknowledged that the executive power would be incompetent to fulfil its task with dignity and utility； unless it enjoyed a greater degree of stability and of strength than had been granted to it in the separate States。
The President is chosen for four years； and he may be reelected； so that the chances of a prolonged administration may inspire him with hopeful undertakings for the public good； and with the means of carrying them into execution。 The President was made the sole representative of the executive power of the Union； and care was taken not to render his decisions subordinate to the vote of a council … a dangerous measure； which tends at the same time to clog the action of the Government and to diminish its responsibility。 The Senate has the right of annulling g certain acts of the President； but it cannot compel him to take any steps； nor does it participate in the exercise of the executive power。
The action of the legislature on the executive power may be direct； and we have just shown that the Americans carefully obviated this influence； but it may； on the other hand； be indirect。 Public assemblies which have the power of depriving an officer of state of his salary encroach upon his independence； and as they are free to make the laws； it is to be feared lest they should gradually appropriate to themselves a portion of that authority which the Constitution had vested in his hands。 This dependence of the executive power is one of the defects inherent in republican constitutions。 The Americans have not been able to counteract the tendency which legislative assemblies have to get possession of the government； but they have rendered this propensity less irresistible。 The salary of the President is fixed； at the time of his entering upon office； for the whole period of his magistracy。 The President is； moreover； provided with a suspensive veto； which allows him to oppose the passing of such laws as might destroy the portion of independence which the Constitution awards him。 The struggle between the President and the legislature must always be an unequal one； since the latter is certain of bearing down all resistance by persevering in its plans； but the suspensive veto forces it at least to reconsider the matter； and； if the motion be persisted in； it must then be backed by a majority of two…thirds of the whole house。 The veto is； in fact； a sort of appeal to the people。 The executive power； which； without this security； might have been secretly oppressed； adopts this means of pleading its cause and stating its motives。 But if the legislature is certain of overpowering all resistance by persevering in its plans； I reply； that in the constitutions of all nations； of whatever kind they may be； a certain point exists at which the legislator is obliged to have recourse to the good sense and the virtue of his fellow…citizens。 This point is more prominent and more discoverable in republics； whilst it is more remote and more carefully concealed in monarchies； but it always exists somewhere。 There is no country in the world in which everything can be provided for by the laws； or in which political institutions can prove a substitute for common sense and public morality。
Differences Between The Position Of The President Of The United States And That Of A Constitutional King Of France
Executive power in the Northern States as limited and as partial as the supremacy which it represents … Executive power in France as universal as the supremacy it represents … The King a branch of the legislature … The President the mere executor of the law … Other differences resulting from the duration of the two powers … The President checked in the exercise of the executive authority … The King independent in its exercise … Notwithstanding these discrepancies France is more akin to a republic than the Union to a monarchy …Comparison of the number of public officers depending upon the executive power in the two countries。
The executive power has so important an influence on the destinies of nations that I am inclined to pause for an instant at this portion of my subject； in order more clearly to explain the part it sustains in America。 In order to form an accurate idea of the position of the President of the United States； it may not be irrelevant to compare it to that of one of the constitutional kings of Europe。 In this comparison I shall pay but little attention to the external signs of power； which are more apt to deceive the eye of the observer than to guide his researches。 When a monarchy is being gradually transformed into a republic； the executive power retains the titles； the honors； the etiquette； and even the funds of royalty long after its authority has disappeared。 The English； after having cut off the head of one king and expelled another from his throne； were accustomed to accost the successor of those princes upon their knees。 On the other hand； when a republic falls under the sway of a single individual； the demeanor of the sovereign is simple and unpretending； as if his authority was not yet paramount。 When the emperors exercised an unlimited control over the fortunes and the lives of their fellow…citizens； it was customary to call them Caesar in conversation； and they were in the habit of supping without formality at their friends' houses。 It is therefore necessary to look below the surface。
The sovereignty of the United States is shared between the Union and the States； whilst in France it is undivided and compact： hence arises the first and the most notable difference which exists between the President of the United States and the King of France。 In the United States the executive power is as limited and partial as the sovereignty of the Union in whose name it acts； in France it is as universal as the authority of the State。 The Americans have a federal and the French a national Government。
Chapter VIII： The Federal Constitution … Part II
This cause of inferiority results from the nature of things； but it is not the only one； the second in importance is as follows： Sovereignty may be defined to be the right of making laws： in France； the King really exercises a portion of the sovereign power； since the laws have no weight till he has given his assent to them； he is； moreover； the executor of all they ordain。 The President is also the executor of the laws； but he does not really co…operate in their formation； since the refusal of his assent does not annul them。 He is therefore merely to be considered as the agent of the sovereign power。 But not only does the King of France exercise a portion of the sovereign power； he also contributes to the nomination of the legislature； which exercises the other portion。 He has the privilege of appointing the members of one chamber； and of dissolving the other at his pleasure； whereas the President of the United States has no share in the formation of the legislative body； and cannot dissolve any part of it。 The King has the same right of bringing forward measures as the Chambers； a right which the President does not possess。 The King is represented in each assembly by his ministers； who explain his intentions； support his opinions； and maintain the principles of the Government。 The President and his ministers are alike excluded from Congress； so that his influence and his opinions can only penetrate indirectly into that great body。 The King of France is therefore on an equal footing with the legislature； which can no more act without him than he can without it。 The President exercises an authority inferior to； and depending upon； that of the legislature。
Even in the exercise of the executive power； properly so called … the point upon which his position seems to be most analogous to that of the King of France … the President labors under several causes of inferiority。 The authority of the King； in France； has； in the first place； the advantage of duration over that of the President； and durability is one of the chief elements of strength； nothing is either loved or feared but what is likely to endure。 The President of the United States is a magistrate elected for four years； the King； in France； is an hereditary sovereign。 In the exercise of the executive power the President of the United States is constantly subject to a jealous scrutiny。 He may make； but he cannot conclude； a treaty； he may designate； but he cannot appoint； a public officer。 *q The King of France is absolute within the limits of his authority。 The President of the United States is responsible for his actions； but the person of the King is declared inviolable by the French Charter。 *r
＇Footnote q： The Constitution had left it doubtful whether the President was obliged to consult the Senate in the removal as well as in the appointment of Federal officers。 〃The Federalist〃 （No。 77） seemed to establish the affirmative； but in 1789 Congress formally decided that； as the President was responsible f