he country； if they were entirely dependent upon the Crown； they cannot therefore be said to depend on either one or the other。 The same cause which induces the king and the people to render public officers independent suggests the necessity of such securities as may prevent their independence from encroaching upon the authority of the former and the liberties of the latter。 They consequently agree as to the necessity of restricting the functionary to a line of conduct laid down beforehand； and they are interested in confining him by certain regulations which he cannot evade。
Chapter XIII： Government Of The Democarcy In America … Part II Instability Of The Administration In The United States
In America the public acts of a community frequently leave fewer traces than the occurrences of a family … Newspapers the only historical remains …Instability of the administration prejudicial to the art of government。
The authority which public men possess in America is so brief； and they are so soon commingled with the ever…changing population of the country； that the acts of a community frequently leave fewer traces than the occurrences of a private family。 The public administration is； so to speak； oral and traditionary。 But little is committed to writing； and that little is wafted away forever； like the leaves of the Sibyl； by the smallest breeze。
The only historical remains in the United States are the newspapers； but if a number be wanting； the chain of time is broken； and the present is severed from the past。 I am convinced that in fifty years it will be more difficult to collect authentic documents concerning the social condition of the Americans at the present day than it is to find remains of the administration of France during the Middle Ages； and if the United States were ever invaded by barbarians； it would be necessary to have recourse to the history of other nations in order to learn anything of the people which now inhabits them。
The instability of the administration has penetrated into the habits of the people： it even appears to suit the general taste； and no one cares for what occurred before his time。 No methodical system is pursued； no archives are formed； and no documents are brought together when it would be very easy to do so。 Where they exist； little store is set upon them； and I have amongst my papers several original public documents which were given to me in answer to some of my inquiries。 In America society seems to live from hand to mouth； like an army in the field。 Nevertheless； the art of administration may undoubtedly be ranked as a science； and no sciences can be improved if the discoveries and observations of successive generations are not connected together in the order in which they occur。 One man； in the short space of his life remarks a fact； another conceives an idea； the former invents a means of execution； the latter reduces a truth to a fixed proposition； and mankind gathers the fruits of individual experience upon its way and gradually forms the sciences。 But the persons who conduct the administration in America can seldom afford any instruction to each other； and when they assume the direction of society； they simply possess those attainments which are most widely disseminated in the community； and no experience peculiar to themselves。 Democracy； carried to its furthest limits； is therefore prejudicial to the art of government； and for this reason it is better adapted to a people already versed in the conduct of an administration than to a nation which is uninitiated in public affairs。
This remark； indeed； is not exclusively applicable to the science of administration。 Although a democratic government is founded upon a very simple and natural principle； it always presupposes the existence of a high degree of culture and enlightenment in society。 *d At the first glance it may be imagined to belong to the earliest ages of the world； but maturer observation will convince us that it could only come last in the succession of human history。
＇Footnote d： It is needless to observe that I speak here of the democratic form of government as applied to a people； not merely to a tribe。＇
Charges Levied By The State Under The Rule Of The American Democracy
In all communities citizens divisible into three classes … Habits of each of these classes in the direction of public finances … Why public expenditure must tend to increase when the people governs … What renders the extravagance of a democracy less to be feared in America … Public expenditure under a democracy。
Before we can affirm whether a democratic form of government is economical or not； we must establish a suitable standard of comparison。 The question would be one of easy solution if we were to attempt to draw a parallel between a democratic republic and an absolute monarchy。 The public expenditure would be found to be more considerable under the former than under the latter； such is the case with all free States compared to those which are not so。 It is certain that despotism ruins individuals by preventing them from producing wealth； much more than by depriving them of the wealth they have produced； it dries up the source of riches； whilst it usually respects acquired property。 Freedom； on the contrary； engenders far more benefits than it destroys； and the nations which are favored by free institutions invariably find that their resources increase even more rapidly than their taxes。
My present object is to compare free nations to each other； and to point out the influence of democracy upon the finances of a State。
Communities； as well as organic bodies； are subject to certain fixed rules in their formation which they cannot evade。 They are composed of certain elements which are common to them at all times and under all circumstances。 The people may always be mentally divided into three distinct classes。 The first of these classes consists of the wealthy； the second； of those who are in easy circumstances； and the third is composed of those who have little or no property； and who subsist more especially by the work which they perform for the two superior orders。 The proportion of the individuals who are included in these three divisions may vary according to the condition of society； but the divisions themselves can never be obliterated。
It is evident that each of these classes will exercise an influence peculiar to its own propensities upon the administration of the finances of the State。 If the first of the three exclusively possesses the legislative power； it is probable that it will not be sparing of the public funds； because the taxes which are levied on a large fortune only tend to diminish the sum of superfluous enjoyment； and are； in point of fact； but little felt。 If the second class has the power of making the laws； it will certainly not be lavish of taxes； because nothing is so onerous as a large impost which is levied upon a small income。 The government of the middle classes appears to me to be the most economical； though perhaps not the most enlightened； and certainly not the most generous； of free governments。
But let us now suppose that the legislative authority is vested in the lowest orders： there are two striking reasons which show that the tendency of the expenditure will be to increase； not to diminish。 As the great majority of those who create the laws are possessed of no property upon which taxes can be imposed； all the money which is spent for the community appears to be spent to their advantage； at no cost of their own； and those who are possessed of some little property readily find means of regulating the taxes so that they are burdensome to the wealthy and profitable to the poor； although the rich are unable to take the same advantage when they are in possession of the Government。
In countries in which the poor *e should be exclusively invested with the power of making the laws no great economy of public expenditure ought to be expected： that expenditure will always be considerable； either because the taxes do not weigh upon those who levy them； or because they are levied in such a manner as not to weigh upon those classes。 In other words； the government of the democracy is the only one under which the power which lays on taxes escapes the payment of them。
＇Footnote e： The word poor is used here； and throughout the remainder of this chapter； in a relative； not in an absolute sense。 Poor men in America would often appear rich in comparison with the poor of Europe； but they may with propriety by styled poor in comparison with their more affluent countrymen。＇
It may be objected （but the argument has no real weight） that the true interest of the people is indissolubly connected with that of the wealthier portion of the community； since it cannot but suffer by the severe measures to which it resorts。 But is it not the true interest of kings to render their subjects happy； and the true interest of nobles to admit recruits into their order on suitable grounds？ If remote advantages had power to prevail over the passions and the exigencies of the moment； no such thing as a tyrannical sovereign or an exclusive aristocracy could ever exist。
Again； it may be objec