in a democratic government eluded by the Federal legislators； and increased by the legislators of the States。
The Federal Constitution differs essentially from that of the States in the ends which it is intended to accomplish； but in the means by which these ends are promoted a greater analogy exists between them。 The objects of the Governments are different； but their forms are the same； and in this special point of view there is some advantage in comparing them together。
I am of opinion that the Federal Constitution is superior to all the Constitutions of the States； for several reasons。
The present Constitution of the Union was formed at a later period than those of the majority of the States； and it may have derived some ameliorations from past experience。 But we shall be led to acknowledge that this is only a secondary cause of its superiority； when we recollect that eleven new States *n have been added to the American Confederation since the promulgation of the Federal Constitution； and that these new republics have always rather exaggerated than avoided the defects which existed in the former Constitutions。
＇Footnote n： ＇The number of States has now risen to 46 （1874）； besides the District of Columbia。＇＇
The chief cause of the superiority of the Federal Constitution lay in the character of the legislators who composed it。 At the time when it was formed the dangers of the Confederation were imminent； and its ruin seemed inevitable。 In this extremity the people chose the men who most deserved the esteem； rather than those who had gained the affections； of the country。 I have already observed that distinguished as almost all the legislators of the Union were for their intelligence； they were still more so for their patriotism。 They had all been nurtured at a time when the spirit of liberty was braced by a continual struggle against a powerful and predominant authority。 When the contest was terminated； whilst the excited passions of the populace persisted in warring with dangers which had ceased to threaten them； these men stopped short in their career； they cast a calmer and more penetrating look upon the country which was now their own； they perceived that the war of independence was definitely ended； and that the only dangers which America had to fear were those which might result from the abuse of the freedom she had won。 They had the courage to say what they believed to be true； because they were animated by a warm and sincere love of liberty； and they ventured to propose restrictions； because they were resolutely opposed to destruction。 *o
＇Footnote o： At this time Alexander Hamilton； who was one of the principal founders of the Constitution； ventured to express the following sentiments in 〃The Federalist；〃 No。 71： …
〃There are some who would be inclined to regard the servile pliancy of the Executive to a prevailing current； either in the community or in the Legislature； as its best recommendation。 But such men entertain very crude notions； as well of the purposes for which government was instituted as of the true means by which the public happiness may be promoted。 The Republican principle demands that the deliberative sense of the community should govern the conduct of those to whom they entrust the management of their affairs； but it does not require an unqualified complaisance to every sudden breeze of passion； or to every transient impulse which the people may receive from the arts of men who flatter their prejudices to betray their interests。 It is a just observation； that the people commonly intend the public good。 This often applies to their very errors。 But their good sense would despise the adulator who should pretend that they always reason right about the means of promoting it。 They know from experience that they sometimes err； and the wonder is that they so seldom err as they do； beset； as they continually are； by the wiles of parasites and sycophants； by the snares of the ambitious； the avaricious； the desperate； by the artifices of men who possess their confidence more than they deserve it； and of those who seek to possess rather than to deserve it。 When occasions present themselves in which the interests of the people are at variance with their inclinations； it is the duty of persons whom they have appointed to be the guardians of those interests to withstand the temporary delusion； in order to give them time and opportunity for more cool and sedate reflection。 Instances might be cited in which a conduct of this kind has saved the people from very fatal consequences of their own mistakes； and has procured lasting monuments of their gratitude to the men who had courage and magnanimity enough to serve them at the peril of their displeasure。〃＇
The greater number of the Constitutions of the States assign one year for the duration of the House of Representatives； and two years for that of the Senate； so that members of the legislative body are constantly and narrowly tied down by the slightest desires of their constituents。 The legislators of the Union were of opinion that this excessive dependence of the Legislature tended to alter the nature of the main consequences of the representative system； since it vested the source； not only of authority； but of government； in the people。 They increased the length of the time for which the representatives were returned； in order to give them freer scope for the exercise of their own judgment。
The Federal Constitution； as well as the Constitutions of the different States； divided the legislative body into two branches。 But in the States these two branches were composed of the same elements； and elected in the same manner。 The consequence was that the passions and inclinations of the populace were as rapidly and as energetically represented in one chamber as in the other； and that laws were made with all the characteristics of violence and precipitation。 By the Federal Constitution the two houses originate in like manner in the choice of the people； but the conditions of eligibility and the mode of election were changed； to the end that； if； as is the case in certain nations； one branch of the Legislature represents the same interests as the other； it may at least represent a superior degree of intelligence and discretion。 A mature age was made one of the conditions of the senatorial dignity； and the Upper House was chosen by an elected assembly of a limited number of members。
To concentrate the whole social force in the hands of the legislative body is the natural tendency of democracies； for as this is the power which emanates the most directly from the people； it is made to participate most fully in the preponderating authority of the multitude； and it is naturally led to monopolize every species of influence。 This concentration is at once prejudicial to a well…conducted administration； and favorable to the despotism of the majority。 The legislators of the States frequently yielded to these democratic propensities； which were invariably and courageously resisted by the founders of the Union。
In the States the executive power is vested in the hands of a magistrate； who is apparently placed upon a level with the Legislature； but who is in reality nothing more than the blind agent and the passive instrument of its decisions。 He can derive no influence from the duration of his functions； which terminate with the revolving year； or from the exercise of prerogatives which can scarcely be said to exist。 The Legislature can condemn him to inaction by intrusting the execution of the laws to special committees of its own members； and can annul his temporary dignity by depriving him of his salary。 The Federal Constitution vests all the privileges and all the responsibility of the executive power in a single individual。 The duration of the Presidency is fixed at four years； the salary of the individual who fills that office cannot be altered during the term of his functions； he is protected by a body of official dependents； and armed with a suspensive veto。 In short； every effort was made to confer a strong and independent position upon the executive authority within the limits which had been prescribed to it。
In the Constitutions of all the States the judicial power is that which remains the most independent of the legislative authority； nevertheless； in all the States the Legislature has reserved to itself the right of regulating the emoluments of the judges； a practice which necessarily subjects these magistrates to its immediate influence。 In some States the judges are only temporarily appointed； which deprives them of a great portion of their power and their freedom。 In others the legislative and judicial powers are entirely confounded； thus the Senate of New York； for instance； constitutes in certain cases the Superior Court of the State。 The Federal Constitution； on the other hand； carefully separates the judicial authority from all external influences； and it provides for the independence of the judges； by declaring that their salary shall not be altered； and that their functions shall be inalienable。
The practical consequences of these different systems may easily be perceived。 An attentive observer will so